|
From: Rich Webb on 21 Apr 2008 09:46 On Mon, 21 Apr 2008 06:18:14 -0700 (PDT), rickman <gnuarm(a)gmail.com> wrote: >If you have to whitelist posters from google groups, how do you see >posts from people who don't post a lot? Will you see my posts? Yup. I started with names that I recognized and added to that list by seeing holes in threads and by filtering the killed log with a Perl script that reports total posts versus posting ID. It's not too hard to pick out the real posters against the noise of accounts like "Monty <montyalexander72(a)gmail.com>," which appears to be one of the newer spam accounts. -- Rich Webb Norfolk, VA
From: Aly on 21 Apr 2008 12:14 "Ed Prochak" <edprochak(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:4944aed7-4faa-436f-a7eb-0ae98a237280(a)l25g2000prd.googlegroups.com... > On Apr 21, 10:16 am, Grant Edwards <gra...(a)visi.com> wrote: >> On 2008-04-21, vorange <orange...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >> > > Yes, I am about to give up using Google groups except for a couple > moderated ones. > (Do you hear this Google?) > > Ed Agreed. The only thing I find Google Groups useful for is searching through archived posts. Frankly if someone can't be bothered to use a usenet NNTP server, then that's there problem. Everyone seems to think that t'Internet is all port 80 these days..
From: andrew.nesterov on 21 Apr 2008 16:01 On Apr 21, 9:14 am, "Aly" <slfjh;sjb(a)DFv3rjgn34,..fv> wrote: > "Ed Prochak" <edproc...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > > news:4944aed7-4faa-436f-a7eb-0ae98a237280(a)l25g2000prd.googlegroups.com... > > > On Apr 21, 10:16 am, Grant Edwards <gra...(a)visi.com> wrote: > >> On 2008-04-21, vorange <orange...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > Yes, I am about to give up using Google groups except for a couple > > moderated ones. > > (Do you hear this Google?) > > > Ed > > Agreed. So do I. > The only thing I find Google Groups useful for is searching through archived > posts. Yes, this is what is good with Google; sometimes to lookup very old posts, once I dug up a message ca 1988. Is out there another archive machine that can be used alternatively? If not, then searching an archive contaminated with all sorts of waste isn't worth the time. Which means that in a few (or may be more) years many technical usenet groups would have been dead barrents. Andrew > Frankly if someone can't be bothered to use a usenet NNTP server, then > that's there problem. Everyone seems to think that t'Internet is all port > 80 these days..
From: rickman on 21 Apr 2008 23:18 On Apr 21, 4:01 pm, andrew.neste...(a)softhome.net wrote: > On Apr 21, 9:14 am, "Aly" <slfjh;sjb(a)DFv3rjgn34,..fv> wrote: > > > "Ed Prochak" <edproc...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > > >news:4944aed7-4faa-436f-a7eb-0ae98a237280(a)l25g2000prd.googlegroups.com... > > > > On Apr 21, 10:16 am, Grant Edwards <gra...(a)visi.com> wrote: > > >> On 2008-04-21, vorange <orange...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > Yes, I am about to give up using Google groups except for a couple > > > moderated ones. > > > (Do you hear this Google?) I am thinking the same thing. I can't believe that Google is going to let a small number of spammers destroy their product. Google groups is quickly becoming useless and unless the direction changes soon, I will just abandon it.
From: jebblue on 22 Apr 2008 21:25 On Mon, 21 Apr 2008 19:06:01 -0400, CBFalconer wrote: > But getting rid of google is essential. This means the newsreader, not > posters. I don't eliminate google posters. I filter Google posters too. Cuts down tremendously on SPAM. Here is the best part of my filters: %BOS [*] Score:: =-9999 Message-ID: teranews Message-ID: dizum Message-ID: virginmedia Message-ID: googlegroups Message-ID: webtv Message-ID: albasani Message-ID: gallopinginsanity Message-ID: orange Message-ID: easynews Message-ID: moria Message-ID: 4ax Message-ID: phx Message-ID: schestowitz Message-ID: newsguy Message-ID: bluewin Message-ID: privat Message-ID: motzarella Message-ID: ziggynet1 %EOS -- // This is my opinion.
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 Prev: playing with ARM and MPC55 Next: looking for SBC to recommend to customer |