From: Tony Houghton on
In <slrn.2008-01-07.21-15-20(a)cunegonde.bas.me.uk>
Ben Shimmin <bas(a)llamaselector.com> wrote:

> Tony Houghton <h(a)realh.co.uk>:
> > In <slrn.2008-01-07.17-31-47(a)cunegonde.bas.me.uk>
> > Ben Shimmin <bas(a)llamaselector.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> I also find that the fetchnews from Leafnode 2 is about an order of
> >> magnitude faster than its predecessor.
> >
> > I bet it's still not as good as newsstar ;->.
>
> Possibly not, though you are perhaps a tiny bit biased... :)

Well, I meant more in overall features than speed; I don't know how they
compare for performance. Newsstar ticks all the right boxes -
pipelining, multiple "threads" [1] and using article numbers instead of
NEWNEWS - but on a typical daily fetch lasting a few seconds it doesn't
get near saturating my connection. It does hoover up the bandwidth when
fetching binaries though.

I think fetchnews+leafnode uses some private protocol for getting the
fetched articles into the server so I haven't made it possible to use
newsstar in place of fetchnews. No doubt I could work it out by reading
the source but the protocol might be subject to change with minimal
documentation and I don't really want to have to keep track of it.

[1] It actually uses separate processes communicating with each other
over pipes for some daft reason, but I might try changing it to use
threads some day.

--
TH * http://www.realh.co.uk

From: Ian Rawlings on
On 2008-01-07, Tony Houghton <h(a)realh.co.uk> wrote:

> Why keep slrn open?

By the same token, why quit it? If it don't need quitting, I don't
quit it ;-)

I have a screen session running with several apps installed on set
screens so I can hit ctrl-A 0 to get to SLRN, ctrl-A 1 to get to my
p2p machine and so on. I used to have mutt in there too but
blunderbird managed to oust mutt, can't remember why now, some
specific feature I needed.

--
Blast off and strike the evil Bydo empire!
From: Owain on
Ben Shimmin wrote:
>>... I wish there was a
>>standard for using some sort of online newsrc files so you could read
>>news from any client without losing track of which articles you've read.
> That sounds rather like what would happen if you crossed Google Reader
> with the 1980s!

No, what you need is INAP :-)

Owain
From: Vince Coen on
<7ee5232c-52be-499f-983e-528f81309ad9(a)q77g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>
Hello Neil!

04 Jan 08 18:29, Neil Sluman wrote to All:

NS> I recently resurrected an old machine. A K6-2 running at 300MHz.
NS> Seems I might as well install Linux on it.

NS> Trouble is, I have no idea what to do with this thing. Anyone have
NS> any thoughts? It's too slow for video. And doesn't really have
NS> enough disk space to use as a file server. (Yes, I know you have no
NS> idea what I'm interested in. I'm after random ideas here!)

NS> Also, what linux distribution I should use? The CPU is in the Pentium
NS> family so anything targetted at Pentium Pro or Pentium 2 or better
NS> isn't going to work.

I installed Mandriva Linux on a old P2 box with 128mb (upgraded to 256mb)
having installed a 60gb IDE drive that the bios could only see 6 mb or so.

Using Linux I created a 150mb partition for swap and the rest for linux,

Luckily Linux can see all the disc space after it installs its own bios.

Vince

Essex, UK Based.

From: Martin Gregorie on
Paul Martin wrote:
> In article <5bm955-1up.ln1(a)zoogz.gregorie.org>,
> Martin Gregorie wrote:
>
>> From memory the BIOS had an number of predefined disk geometries you
>> could select but none defined a disk of over 6.4 GB. It also provided
>> the ability to accept your own definition, but you couldn't put in
>> anything that exceeded 6.4 GB.
>
> What happens if you put a larger drive in, but tell the BIOS that it's
> only 6.4GB in size?
>
I never tried that.

In any case, I'm disappointed with the performance of the machine -
subjectively another box with a 133MHz Pentium and 128 MB as 4 x SIMMs
is faster.

The P133 (currently a semi-gutted chassis) has a BIOS that DOES work OK
with a 30 GB disk (don't know about 40 GB - never tried), but is a
Baby/AT mobo format, so is almost junk by now.

As the K6 box is an early ATX midi tower I should just gut it and scare
up a decent board with a bit of speed and big disk capability. The tower
case design is poor though - badly placed drive bays and not nearly
enough of them.


--
martin@ | Martin Gregorie
gregorie. | Essex, UK
org |
First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Prev: Linux equivalent of Telnet?
Next: File encryption