Why is Object Oriented so successfull
in [OOP]
|
Prev: Proxy pattern: remote chat proxy and interfaces
Next: Derived class calling overriden base class methods
From: S Perryman on 31 Jan 2008 17:45 topmind wrote: > On Jan 30, 2:20 pm, S Perryman <q...(a)q.com> wrote: TM>I'm tired of OOP verbal claims of curing cancer and saving Dolphins. TM>Let's see it as code. TM>gauntlet.throw.direction = down; >>Where is your reply to the "Robert Martins' payroll example (Was: Why is >>Object Oriented so successfull)" posting I made this week to comp.object > I don't have the book with me right now. And how will the book help you answer the questions in my posting ?? In fact, one of the questions has already been answered (as I suspected) by someone irrefutably best-placed to do so, has it not ?? > And, I > did not see your evidence of "procedural combinatorial explosion" for > the library publications example. Do you need to retreive a book to > answer that one? Nope, that one is well on the way (probably tomorrow lunch-time UK time) . > Hint: my code implements features, NOT noun taxonomies. If there is > mass duplication in feature implementation, then I use subroutine > factoring. The DB tracks classifications of specific nouns or kinds of > nouns (unless it is trivial and rarely-changing). Irrelevant to the topic of your non-reply to afore-mentioned posting. Regards, Steven Perryman
From: topmind on 31 Jan 2008 17:54 On Jan 30, 2:45 pm, S Perryman <q...(a)q.com> wrote: > >>Where is your reply to the "Robert Martins' payroll example (Was: Why is > >>Object Oriented so successfull)" posting I made this week to comp.object > > I don't have the book with me right now. > > And how will the book help you answer the questions in my posting ?? What I used as the requirements. [...] > Regards, > Steven Perryman -T-
From: S Perryman on 31 Jan 2008 18:08 topmind wrote: > On Jan 30, 2:45 pm, S Perryman <q...(a)q.com> wrote: SP>Where is your reply to the "Robert Martins' payroll example (Was: Why is SP>Object Oriented so successfull)" posting I made this week to comp.object TM>I don't have the book with me right now. >>And how will the book help you answer the questions in my posting ?? > What I used as the requirements. 1. You cannot tell what the "requirements" are from the ramblings on your own web pages ?? Nice. 2. Probably best for you not to bother. I suspect I will get from someone the answer both quicker and more definitively than if I wait for you ... Regards, Steven Perryman
From: topmind on 31 Jan 2008 18:20
On Jan 30, 3:08 pm, S Perryman <q...(a)q.com> wrote: > topmind wrote: > > On Jan 30, 2:45 pm, S Perryman <q...(a)q.com> wrote: > > SP>Where is your reply to the "Robert Martins' payroll example (Was: Why is > SP>Object Oriented so successfull)" posting I made this week to comp.object > > TM>I don't have the book with me right now. > > >>And how will the book help you answer the questions in my posting ?? > > What I used as the requirements. > > 1. You cannot tell what the "requirements" are from the ramblings on your > own web pages ?? Nice. I could make a guess and hit roughly 85%, but given your tendency to get pedantic and conspiratorial over little things, I figure I should make sure I get it right the first time to avoid 50 messages merely on the topic of misquoting the book. You are not a flexible being. > Regards, > Steven Perryman -T- |