From: Tony Harding on
Christopher Muto wrote:
> "Tom Scales" <tjscales(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:22766EBC3FEC489D9235856B263FF69A(a)M2010...
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: RnR [mailto:rnrtexas(a)gmail.com]
>>> Posted At: Monday, April 28, 2008 5:23 PM
>>> Posted To: alt.sys.pc-clone.dell
>>> Conversation: Windows XP or Vista?
>>> Subject: Re: Windows XP or Vista?
>>>
>>> On Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:48:34 -0700 (PDT), "void.no.spam.com(a)gmail.com"
>>> <void.no.spam.com(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I've been doing some more reading, and now wonder if my parents
>> should
>>>> get XP or Vista for their new computer.
>>>>
>>>> Is Vista really that bad?
>>>>
>>>> XP is what, 7 years old now? In a few years, some software
>> developers
>>>> won't support XP anymore. (I have a Windows 2000 PC, and noticed
>> that
>>>> Apple recently stopped supporting Win2K for their QuickTime product.)
>>>> So that would be a reason to get Vista.
>>>>
>>>> Also, does the 32-bit version of Vista support ALL 32-bit apps and
>>>> drivers? Just wondering if the Orinoco Gold wireless adapter in my
>>>> parents' current computer will work with Vista.
>>>
>>> Why gamble with Vista when more like XP. Likely you have less
>>> problem with drivers if you go with XP. Worry about the future when
>>> it becomes a problem. Keep it all simple for now.
>> As I recall, the Model T was pretty reliable, as was the horse.
>>
>> It's time to just go with Vista.
>
> i think the horse is a better analogy for vista than the model t. a horse,
> like vista, would leave constant 'reminders' its presence in your life.
> alternatively the model t would subtle pollute the environment and not
> bother you for many years until awaking one day to the realization that the
> whole world now suffers from global warming.

What? (what are you smoking, Chris?) ;)
From: Christopher Muto on
"Tony Harding" <ToHard(a)nowhere.org> wrote in message
news:481ff5e4$0$25062$607ed4bc(a)cv.net...
> Christopher Muto wrote:
>> "Tom Scales" <tjscales(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:22766EBC3FEC489D9235856B263FF69A(a)M2010...
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: RnR [mailto:rnrtexas(a)gmail.com]
>>>> Posted At: Monday, April 28, 2008 5:23 PM
>>>> Posted To: alt.sys.pc-clone.dell
>>>> Conversation: Windows XP or Vista?
>>>> Subject: Re: Windows XP or Vista?
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:48:34 -0700 (PDT), "void.no.spam.com(a)gmail.com"
>>>> <void.no.spam.com(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I've been doing some more reading, and now wonder if my parents
>>> should
>>>>> get XP or Vista for their new computer.
>>>>>
>>>>> Is Vista really that bad?
>>>>>
>>>>> XP is what, 7 years old now? In a few years, some software
>>> developers
>>>>> won't support XP anymore. (I have a Windows 2000 PC, and noticed
>>> that
>>>>> Apple recently stopped supporting Win2K for their QuickTime product.)
>>>>> So that would be a reason to get Vista.
>>>>>
>>>>> Also, does the 32-bit version of Vista support ALL 32-bit apps and
>>>>> drivers? Just wondering if the Orinoco Gold wireless adapter in my
>>>>> parents' current computer will work with Vista.
>>>>
>>>> Why gamble with Vista when more like XP. Likely you have less
>>>> problem with drivers if you go with XP. Worry about the future when
>>>> it becomes a problem. Keep it all simple for now.
>>> As I recall, the Model T was pretty reliable, as was the horse.
>>>
>>> It's time to just go with Vista.
>>
>> i think the horse is a better analogy for vista than the model t. a
>> horse, like vista, would leave constant 'reminders' its presence in your
>> life. alternatively the model t would subtle pollute the environment and
>> not bother you for many years until awaking one day to the realization
>> that the whole world now suffers from global warming.
>
> What? (what are you smoking, Chris?) ;)

5w30