From: David Miller on
From: tytso(a)mit.edu
Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2010 10:17:20 -0500

> It worked just *fine* using 2.6.33-rc4. I have no xorg.conf file (X
> is autoconfiguring itself) and I'm using an Ubuntu 9.10 userspace.

X uses udev events to find input devices these days, so it's probably
the same problem preventing your lvm devices from showing up correctly
from initramfs.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
From: tytso on
On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 07:20:07AM -0800, David Miller wrote:
> From: tytso(a)mit.edu
> Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2010 10:17:20 -0500
>
> > It worked just *fine* using 2.6.33-rc4. I have no xorg.conf file (X
> > is autoconfiguring itself) and I'm using an Ubuntu 9.10 userspace.
>
> X uses udev events to find input devices these days, so it's probably
> the same problem preventing your lvm devices from showing up correctly
> from initramfs.

It uses libhal, I believe to find input devices and I was finally able
to work around the problem by configuring an manually recreated
xorg.conf file with the magic option:

Section "ServerFlags"
Option "AllowEmptyInput" "off"
EndSection

.... and then making sure that the kbd and mouse input drivers were
installed. There is definitely something wrong though if sometime
between 2;6.33-rc4 and 2.6.33 we've made some incompatible sysfs
change that breaks hal on Ubuntu 9.10 (which is still the latest
Ubuntu community release), such that people can't test 2.6.33 kernels
using it --- at least not easily.

See Linus's complaints over the nouveau driver; it's the same
principle; something is really broken.

- Ted

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
From: tytso on
On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 03:11:53PM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 2:40 PM, <tytso(a)mit.edu> wrote:
> > See Linus's complaints over the nouveau driver; it's the same
> > principle; something is really broken.
>
> Not really, this is just somebody doing something stupid one would hope,
>
> does lshal on both kernels give similiar results?

No, it's quite different. See attached.

--- lshal-2.6.33 2010-03-06 10:15:44.837265508 -0500
+++ lshal-2.6.32-git4 2010-03-06 18:45:35.782582002 -0500
@@ -1,17 +1,2446 @@

-Dumping 23 device(s) from the Global Device List:
+Dumping 149 device(s) from the Global Device List:
-------------------------------------------------
....


It looks like it's fixed as of 2.6.33-git10. Hopefully whoever fixed
it will backport it to 2.6.33-STABLE, since this will seriously screw
up anyone wanting to use 2.6.33 at least on Ubuntu; I don't know about
other distributions.

- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/