From: Serge E. Hallyn on
Quoting Kees Cook (kees.cook(a)canonical.com):
> The inode_follow_link LSM hook is called in bind mount situations as
> well as for symlink situations, so we must explicitly check for the
> inode being a symlink to not reject bind mounts in 1777 directories,

Are you sure about that??

If that's true, you might also expand the comment in
include/linux/security.h.

> which seems to be a common NFSv4 configuration.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <kees.cook(a)canonical.com>
> ---
> security/yama/yama_lsm.c | 4 ++++
> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/security/yama/yama_lsm.c b/security/yama/yama_lsm.c
> index 3b76386..c70eb10 100644
> --- a/security/yama/yama_lsm.c
> +++ b/security/yama/yama_lsm.c
> @@ -116,6 +116,10 @@ static int yama_inode_follow_link(struct dentry *dentry,
> if (!protected_sticky_symlinks)
> return 0;
>
> + /* if inode isn't a symlink, don't try to evaluate blocking it */
> + if (!S_ISLNK(inode->i_mode))
> + return 0;
> +
> /* owner and follower match? */
> cred = current_cred();
> inode = dentry->d_inode;
> --
> 1.7.1
>
>
> --
> Kees Cook
> Ubuntu Security Team
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in
> the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
From: Kees Cook on
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 03:30:21PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> The inode_follow_link LSM hook is called in bind mount situations as
> well as for symlink situations, so we must explicitly check for the
> inode being a symlink to not reject bind mounts in 1777 directories,
> which seems to be a common NFSv4 configuration.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <kees.cook(a)canonical.com>
> ---
> security/yama/yama_lsm.c | 4 ++++
> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/security/yama/yama_lsm.c b/security/yama/yama_lsm.c
> index 3b76386..c70eb10 100644
> --- a/security/yama/yama_lsm.c
> +++ b/security/yama/yama_lsm.c
> @@ -116,6 +116,10 @@ static int yama_inode_follow_link(struct dentry *dentry,
> if (!protected_sticky_symlinks)
> return 0;
>
> + /* if inode isn't a symlink, don't try to evaluate blocking it */
> + if (!S_ISLNK(inode->i_mode))
> + return 0;
> +
> /* owner and follower match? */
> cred = current_cred();
> inode = dentry->d_inode;

Erg, please ignore this -- I tested a slightly different version of this
patch. This version doesn't have inode set yet. I will follow up with the
correct one in a moment...

-Kees

--
Kees Cook
Ubuntu Security Team
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
From: Kees Cook on
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 09:30:48PM -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Kees Cook (kees.cook(a)canonical.com):
> > The inode_follow_link LSM hook is called in bind mount situations as
> > well as for symlink situations, so we must explicitly check for the
> > inode being a symlink to not reject bind mounts in 1777 directories,
>
> Are you sure about that??
>
> If that's true, you might also expand the comment in
> include/linux/security.h.
>
> > which seems to be a common NFSv4 configuration.

Well, the issue is how the NFSv4 client deals with it. It seems to treat
the mounts from the NFSv4 root as a symlink when the server is using bind
mounts. It's kind of weird:
https://launchpad.net/bugs/604407

--
Kees Cook
Ubuntu Security Team
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
From: James Morris on
On Tue, 13 Jul 2010, Kees Cook wrote:

> The inode_follow_link LSM hook is called in bind mount situations as
> well as for symlink situations, so we must explicitly check for the
> inode being a symlink to not reject bind mounts in 1777 directories,
> which seems to be a common NFSv4 configuration.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <kees.cook(a)canonical.com>
> ---
> v2:
> - actually set inode in time to use it. *face palm*

Applied to
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jmorris/security-testing-2.6#next


--
James Morris
<jmorris(a)namei.org>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/