From: jasee on
Dave Liquorice wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Apr 2008 07:37:32 +0100, Geoff Cox wrote:
>
>> 1.8 GHz Celeron
>> 512 MB RAM
>> 40 GB disk
>
> Massive web site that needs a 40GB disc including the OS. B-)
>
> The figure that is most important is how much data/month on what sized
> pipe (in real terms) they offer with that. It's no good haveing a
> cheap server behind a small pipe with a low data throughput.
>
> The information available from http://www.webperf.net

Strange that Demon (or Thus) seems to be missing from the list?


From: Geoff Cox on
On Tue, 22 Apr 2008 10:20:07 +0100, Nick Kew
<nick(a)grimnir.webthing.com> wrote:

>On Tue, 22 Apr 2008 07:37:32 +0100
>Geoff Cox <gcox(a)freeuk.notcom> wrote:
>
>> This is a relatively low price (? )but what do you think of the server
>> spec?
>
>The expensive bit is the data transfer. What you get for that
>price will produce a negligible load on that hardware.
>Unless you have something you're not telling us about
>also running!

nothing secret here! some audio files but total size of these 15MB.

Cheers

Geoff
From: Geoff Cox on
On Mon, 21 Apr 2008 23:50:56 -0700 (PDT), Ian
<ian.groups(a)btinternet.com> wrote:

>On 22 Apr, 07:37, Geoff Cox <g...(a)freeuk.notcom> wrote:
>
>> Any better alternatives in the UK?
>
>uk2.net will do you Pentium Dual Core 2GHz/1GB/80GB/10TB per month for
>�59/month. CentOS, Fedora, Ubuntu or Debian.
>
>http://www.uk2.net/servers/
>
>Ian

thanks Ian - will follow up on that.

Cheers

Geoff
From: Geoff Cox on
On Tue, 22 Apr 2008 08:19:45 GMT, Will Kemp <Will(a)xxxx.Swaggie.net>
wrote:

>http://csoft.net offer shared FreeBSD hosting, with apache etc, and shell
>access via ssh. No bandwidth limit and quite a bit of hard drive space.
>Month by month contracts.
>
>They seem to be reliable and tech support is generally very responsive
>and helpful.
>
>They're in Canada though.

any downside to that? I would have thought not?

Cheers

Geoff
From: Geoff Cox on
On Tue, 22 Apr 2008 09:44:44 +0100 (BST), "Dave Liquorice"
<allsortsnotthisbit(a)howhill.com> wrote:

>On Tue, 22 Apr 2008 07:37:32 +0100, Geoff Cox wrote:
>
>> 1.8 GHz Celeron
>> 512 MB RAM
>> 40 GB disk
>
>Massive web site that needs a 40GB disc including the OS. B-)
>
>The figure that is most important is how much data/month on what sized
>pipe (in real terms) they offer with that. It's no good haveing a cheap
>server behind a small pipe with a low data throughput.
>
>The information available from http://www.webperf.net and
>http://uptime.netcraft.com/ can be enlightening. Have some salt handy,
>just like any information from the 'net.

I'll follow up your 2 links.

Thanks

Geoff