From: BobF on
This ( http://www.runtime.org/driveimage-xml.htm ) was recommended as a
bu/imaging solution.

I've been using ghost'03, but I've grown tired of booting into PC-Dos to
do backups. DiXML has the option of using shadowing so it runs in windows.

Anyway, I've made a couple of images with it. Haven't tested restore yet.

This topic comes up periodically, so I thought I'd share.
From: Ricky Hunt on
"BobF" <nothanks(a)spamfree.world> wrote in message
news:fun0hf$920$1(a)aioe.org...
> This ( http://www.runtime.org/driveimage-xml.htm ) was recommended as a
> bu/imaging solution.
>
> I've been using ghost'03, but I've grown tired of booting into PC-Dos to
> do backups. DiXML has the option of using shadowing so it runs in
> windows.
>
> Anyway, I've made a couple of images with it. Haven't tested restore yet.
>
> This topic comes up periodically, so I thought I'd share.

Wow. Looks good (and free!). Let us know how it goes. Restoring without
rebooting too.


From: Kay on
> This ( http://www.runtime.org/driveimage-xml.htm ) was recommended as a
> bu/imaging solution.
>
> I've been using ghost'03, but I've grown tired of booting into PC-Dos to
> do backups. DiXML has the option of using shadowing so it runs in
> windows.
>
> Anyway, I've made a couple of images with it. Haven't tested restore yet.
>
> This topic comes up periodically, so I thought I'd share.

This tool in included in the 'Ultimate Boot CD for Windows' (along with some
other fine tools) so no real need to rely on your DOS bootdisk any more:
http://www.ubcd4win.com/


Kay

From: John Braner on
BobF wrote:
> This ( http://www.runtime.org/driveimage-xml.htm ) was recommended as a
> bu/imaging solution.
>
> I've been using ghost'03, but I've grown tired of booting into PC-Dos to
> do backups. DiXML has the option of using shadowing so it runs in windows.
>
> Anyway, I've made a couple of images with it. Haven't tested restore yet.
>
> This topic comes up periodically, so I thought I'd share.

I just think it makes sense to boot into DOS or linux or whatever - to
do a backup of a Windows PC. You can never back up all the open files
etc, and you'll always have to take some sort of "snapshot" of the
system while it's up - to do the backup. When it's shut down (and you
boot something else from CD) everything is closed and "off" and I just
think you have a better back up.

Just my �0.02 (worth about $0.04 now) ;-)

--
===========
John Braner

jbraner(a)NOblueyonderSPAM.co.uk
http://www.soundclick.com/johnbraner_music.htm (that's an underscore)
** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **
From: BobF on
John Braner wrote:
> BobF wrote:
>> This ( http://www.runtime.org/driveimage-xml.htm ) was recommended as
>> a bu/imaging solution.
>>
>> I've been using ghost'03, but I've grown tired of booting into PC-Dos
>> to do backups. DiXML has the option of using shadowing so it runs in
>> windows.
>>
>> Anyway, I've made a couple of images with it. Haven't tested restore
>> yet.
>>
>> This topic comes up periodically, so I thought I'd share.
>
> I just think it makes sense to boot into DOS or linux or whatever - to
> do a backup of a Windows PC. You can never back up all the open files
> etc, and you'll always have to take some sort of "snapshot" of the
> system while it's up - to do the backup. When it's shut down (and you
> boot something else from CD) everything is closed and "off" and I just
> think you have a better back up.
>

Yeah, if you're still -using- the machine during the backup then you'd
end up with a mismatch. OTOH, if you're pretty much just backing up,
then it's a great convenience, IMO.

> Just my �0.02 (worth about $0.04 now) ;-)
>

I'm sure perspective is involved in the valuation somewhere :-))