From: Yan, Zheng on
2010/7/29 Miao Xie <miaox(a)cn.fujitsu.com>:
> From: Liu Bo <liubo2009(a)cn.fujitsu.com>
>
> Only when a page is not found by page_index, we'll go to the error check.
>
> Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <liubo2009(a)cn.fujitsu.com>
> Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox(a)cn.fujitsu.com>
> ---
> �fs/btrfs/compression.c | � �2 +-
> �1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/compression.c b/fs/btrfs/compression.c
> index cb3877c..8458840 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/compression.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/compression.c
> @@ -467,7 +467,7 @@ static noinline int add_ra_bio_pages(struct inode *inode,
> � � � � � � � �rcu_read_lock();
> � � � � � � � �page = radix_tree_lookup(&mapping->page_tree, page_index);
> � � � � � � � �rcu_read_unlock();
> - � � � � � � � if (page) {
> + � � � � � � � if (!page) {
> �check_misses:
> � � � � � � � � � � � �misses++;
> � � � � � � � � � � � �if (misses > 4)

This patch is wrong. The word "miss" here means "miss for read-ahead because
the page is already in the page cache"

Yan, Zheng
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
From: Miao Xie on
On Thu, 29 Jul 2010 18:38:39 +0800, Yan, Zheng wrote:
> 2010/7/29 Miao Xie<miaox(a)cn.fujitsu.com>:
>> From: Liu Bo<liubo2009(a)cn.fujitsu.com>
>>
>> Only when a page is not found by page_index, we'll go to the error check.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Liu Bo<liubo2009(a)cn.fujitsu.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Miao Xie<miaox(a)cn.fujitsu.com>
>> ---
>> fs/btrfs/compression.c | 2 +-
>> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/compression.c b/fs/btrfs/compression.c
>> index cb3877c..8458840 100644
>> --- a/fs/btrfs/compression.c
>> +++ b/fs/btrfs/compression.c
>> @@ -467,7 +467,7 @@ static noinline int add_ra_bio_pages(struct inode *inode,
>> rcu_read_lock();
>> page = radix_tree_lookup(&mapping->page_tree, page_index);
>> rcu_read_unlock();
>> - if (page) {
>> + if (!page) {
>> check_misses:
>> misses++;
>> if (misses> 4)
>
> This patch is wrong. The word "miss" here means "miss for read-ahead because
> the page is already in the page cache"

Oh, my mistake. Sorry!
Please ignore this patch.

Thanks for your review! How about the others?
Miao

>
> Yan, Zheng
>
>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/