From: Mike Treseler on
FP wrote:

> From design point of view I am not sure if I should be putting them in
> 2 seperate process statements.

No. One verilog block is one vhdl process.

> My question is
> 1) Is the VHDL equivalent of the above, 2 case statements in one
> process or 2 different processes with 1 case each?

one process

> 2) The above is similar to an FSM. One case statement is executing the
> present command, while the other is completing the last command. Any
> idea on how this should be converted to VHDL?

Did the verilog version work?

-- Mike Treseler
From: FP on
On Apr 14, 4:01 pm, Mike Treseler <mike_trese...(a)comcast.net> wrote:
> FP wrote:
> > From design point of view I am not sure if I should be putting them in
> > 2 seperate process statements.
>
> No. One verilog block is one vhdl process.
>
> > My question is
> > 1) Is the VHDL equivalent of the above, 2 case statements in one
> > process or 2 different processes with 1 case each?
>
> one process
>
> > 2) The above is similar to an FSM. One case statement is executing the
> > present command, while the other is completing the last command. Any
> > idea on how this should be converted to VHDL?
>
> Did the verilog version work?
>
>          -- Mike Treseler

The verilog code works but I havent deisnged it. So, I am not sure how
its implementation in VHDL woould be.
From: Mike Treseler on
FP wrote:

> The verilog code works but I havent deisnged it. So, I am not sure how
> its implementation in VHDL woould be.

Unless you post the code, neither am I.

-- Mike Treseler
First  |  Prev  | 
Pages: 1 2
Prev: Space - Xilinx Frontier?
Next: ISE 9.2 and Windriver