From: Steve French on
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 5:26 PM, Jeff Layton <jlayton(a)samba.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 22:46:38 +0100
> David Howells <dhowells(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > Jeff Layton <jlayton(a)samba.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Looks like it mostly uses the ctime. IMO, the mtime would be a better
> > > choice since it changes less frequently, but I don't guess that it
> > > matters very much.
> >
> > I'd've thought mtime changes more frequently since that's altered when data is
> > written. �ctime is changed when attributes are changed.
> >
>
> IIUC, updating mtime for a write is also an attribute change, and that
> affects ctime. According to the stat(2) manpage:
>
> � � � The field st_ctime is changed by writing or by setting �inode �informa-
> � � � tion (i.e., owner, group, link count, mode, etc.).
>
> > Note that Ext4 appears to have a file creation time field in its inode
> > (struct ext4_inode::i_crtime[_extra]). �Can Samba be made to use that?
> >
>
> Is it exposed to userspace in any (standard) way? It would be handy to
> have that. While we're wishing...it might also be nice to have a
> standard way to get at the i_generation from userspace too.
>

Yes - I have talked with MingMing and Aneesh about those (NFS may
someday be able to use those too).� An obstacle in the past had been
that samba server stores its own fake creation time in an ndr encoded
xattr which complicates things.

MingMing/Annesh -
Xattr or other way to get at birth time?


--
Thanks,

Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/