From: FUJITA Tomonori on
On Sun, 6 Jun 2010 13:53:04 +0300
Marin Mitov <mitov(a)issp.bas.bg> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> The error path in dma_declare_coherent_memory() leaves
> the pointer dev->dma_mem non completely initialized.
>
> If allocation of dev->dma_mem succeeds,
> but allocation of dev->dma_mem->bitmap fails
> dev->dma_mem is freed, but left non NULL
> and non completely initialized.
>
> Either zero it after being freed (one liner patch), or assign to
> dev->dma_mem only completely initialized structure (patch included).
>
> Comments welcome.
>
> Marin Mitov
>
> Signed-off-by: Marin Mitov <mitov(a)issp.bas.bg>

Hmm, if dma_declare_coherent_memory() fails, the driver doesn't use
dev->dma_mem. So even if dev->dma_mem points to a freed memory, I'm
not sure that it causes a real problem. We could call this patch a
cleanup though.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
From: Marin Mitov on
On Monday, June 07, 2010 05:30:48 am FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> On Sun, 6 Jun 2010 13:53:04 +0300
> Marin Mitov <mitov(a)issp.bas.bg> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > The error path in dma_declare_coherent_memory() leaves
> > the pointer dev->dma_mem non completely initialized.
> >
> > If allocation of dev->dma_mem succeeds,
> > but allocation of dev->dma_mem->bitmap fails
> > dev->dma_mem is freed, but left non NULL
> > and non completely initialized.
> >
> > Either zero it after being freed (one liner patch), or assign to
> > dev->dma_mem only completely initialized structure (patch included).
> >
> > Comments welcome.
> >
> > Marin Mitov
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Marin Mitov <mitov(a)issp.bas.bg>
>
> Hmm, if dma_declare_coherent_memory() fails, the driver doesn't use
> dev->dma_mem. So even if dev->dma_mem points to a freed memory, I'm
> not sure that it causes a real problem. We could call this patch a
> cleanup though.
>
My understanding of dma_alloc_coherent() is that we first try to allocate from
per-device coherent memory and we do it using dma_alloc_from_coherent()
(in drivers/base/dma-coherent.c) if dev->dma_mem is not NULL (and we have
left it not NULL, here is the problem). If allocation of dev->dma_mem->bitmap
fails dev->dma_mem must be NULL.

Marin Mitov

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
From: FUJITA Tomonori on
On Mon, 7 Jun 2010 07:08:56 +0300
Marin Mitov <mitov(a)issp.bas.bg> wrote:

> On Monday, June 07, 2010 05:30:48 am FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> > On Sun, 6 Jun 2010 13:53:04 +0300
> > Marin Mitov <mitov(a)issp.bas.bg> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > The error path in dma_declare_coherent_memory() leaves
> > > the pointer dev->dma_mem non completely initialized.
> > >
> > > If allocation of dev->dma_mem succeeds,
> > > but allocation of dev->dma_mem->bitmap fails
> > > dev->dma_mem is freed, but left non NULL
> > > and non completely initialized.
> > >
> > > Either zero it after being freed (one liner patch), or assign to
> > > dev->dma_mem only completely initialized structure (patch included).
> > >
> > > Comments welcome.
> > >
> > > Marin Mitov
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Marin Mitov <mitov(a)issp.bas.bg>
> >
> > Hmm, if dma_declare_coherent_memory() fails, the driver doesn't use
> > dev->dma_mem. So even if dev->dma_mem points to a freed memory, I'm
> > not sure that it causes a real problem. We could call this patch a
> > cleanup though.
> >
> My understanding of dma_alloc_coherent() is that we first try to allocate from
> per-device coherent memory and we do it using dma_alloc_from_coherent()
> (in drivers/base/dma-coherent.c) if dev->dma_mem is not NULL (and we have
> left it not NULL, here is the problem). If allocation of dev->dma_mem->bitmap
> fails dev->dma_mem must be NULL.

But are there any driver that can continue when dma_declare_coherent_memory() fails?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
From: Marin Mitov on
On Monday, June 07, 2010 07:27:49 am FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Jun 2010 07:08:56 +0300
> Marin Mitov <mitov(a)issp.bas.bg> wrote:
>
> > On Monday, June 07, 2010 05:30:48 am FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> > > On Sun, 6 Jun 2010 13:53:04 +0300
> > > Marin Mitov <mitov(a)issp.bas.bg> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > The error path in dma_declare_coherent_memory() leaves
> > > > the pointer dev->dma_mem non completely initialized.
> > > >
> > > > If allocation of dev->dma_mem succeeds,
> > > > but allocation of dev->dma_mem->bitmap fails
> > > > dev->dma_mem is freed, but left non NULL
> > > > and non completely initialized.
> > > >
> > > > Either zero it after being freed (one liner patch), or assign to
> > > > dev->dma_mem only completely initialized structure (patch included).
> > > >
> > > > Comments welcome.
> > > >
> > > > Marin Mitov
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Marin Mitov <mitov(a)issp.bas.bg>
> > >
> > > Hmm, if dma_declare_coherent_memory() fails, the driver doesn't use
> > > dev->dma_mem. So even if dev->dma_mem points to a freed memory, I'm
> > > not sure that it causes a real problem. We could call this patch a
> > > cleanup though.
> > >
> > My understanding of dma_alloc_coherent() is that we first try to allocate from
> > per-device coherent memory and we do it using dma_alloc_from_coherent()
> > (in drivers/base/dma-coherent.c) if dev->dma_mem is not NULL (and we have
> > left it not NULL, here is the problem). If allocation of dev->dma_mem->bitmap
> > fails dev->dma_mem must be NULL.
>
> But are there any driver that can continue when dma_declare_coherent_memory() fails?
>
I do not know if such a real driver exists.

My understanding of drivers' use of dma_declare_coherent_memory() is to
declare some (may be on board) memory as coherent, so when they call
dma_alloc_coherent() the request is satisfied first from this area and when
it is exhausted fall back to other pools of coherent memory. As far as a fall back
exists the driver may continue even if dma_declare_coherent_memory() fails.

Marin Mitov
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
From: FUJITA Tomonori on
On Mon, 7 Jun 2010 07:43:19 +0300
Marin Mitov <mitov(a)issp.bas.bg> wrote:

> On Monday, June 07, 2010 07:27:49 am FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> > On Mon, 7 Jun 2010 07:08:56 +0300
> > Marin Mitov <mitov(a)issp.bas.bg> wrote:
> >
> > > On Monday, June 07, 2010 05:30:48 am FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> > > > On Sun, 6 Jun 2010 13:53:04 +0300
> > > > Marin Mitov <mitov(a)issp.bas.bg> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi all,
> > > > >
> > > > > The error path in dma_declare_coherent_memory() leaves
> > > > > the pointer dev->dma_mem non completely initialized.
> > > > >
> > > > > If allocation of dev->dma_mem succeeds,
> > > > > but allocation of dev->dma_mem->bitmap fails
> > > > > dev->dma_mem is freed, but left non NULL
> > > > > and non completely initialized.
> > > > >
> > > > > Either zero it after being freed (one liner patch), or assign to
> > > > > dev->dma_mem only completely initialized structure (patch included).
> > > > >
> > > > > Comments welcome.
> > > > >
> > > > > Marin Mitov
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Marin Mitov <mitov(a)issp.bas.bg>
> > > >
> > > > Hmm, if dma_declare_coherent_memory() fails, the driver doesn't use
> > > > dev->dma_mem. So even if dev->dma_mem points to a freed memory, I'm
> > > > not sure that it causes a real problem. We could call this patch a
> > > > cleanup though.
> > > >
> > > My understanding of dma_alloc_coherent() is that we first try to allocate from
> > > per-device coherent memory and we do it using dma_alloc_from_coherent()
> > > (in drivers/base/dma-coherent.c) if dev->dma_mem is not NULL (and we have
> > > left it not NULL, here is the problem). If allocation of dev->dma_mem->bitmap
> > > fails dev->dma_mem must be NULL.
> >
> > But are there any driver that can continue when dma_declare_coherent_memory() fails?
> >
> I do not know if such a real driver exists.

From a quick look, seems no. There is no fallback for such hardware,
it's safe assumption, I guess.

As I wrote, I don't think that the patch is rc material since seems
that this doesn't cause a real problem. However, it looks fine for
the next merge window.

Thanks,
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/