From: Ulrich Drepper on
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 07:40, Olaf van der Spek <olafvdspek(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> File not found is a very common error message with a pretty will
> understood meaning. Overloading it in this way causes confusion.

Again and again: this is not the message the user should ever see. On
its own. Once you precede it with the message about the dynamic
linker not being found and the name the ENOENT string is the right
one.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
From: Andreas Schwab on
Olaf van der Spek <olafvdspek(a)gmail.com> writes:

> File not found is a very common error message with a pretty will
> understood meaning.

And perfectly applicable here (as you write yourself in the subject).

> Overloading another error code would avoid this confusion, especially
> since it's far less used.

Changing a well understood error number into a totally misleading one
only increases confusion.

Andreas.

--
Andreas Schwab, schwab(a)linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
From: Olaf van der Spek on
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 6:00 PM, Andreas Schwab <schwab(a)linux-m68k.org> wrote:
> Olaf van der Spek <olafvdspek(a)gmail.com> writes:
>
>> File not found is a very common error message with a pretty will
>> understood meaning.
>
> And perfectly applicable here (as you write yourself in the subject).

No, it's not. It does not apply to the argument of the function called.

>> Overloading another error code would avoid this confusion, especially
>> since it's far less used.
>
> Changing a well understood error number into a totally misleading one
> only increases confusion.

Why is it totally misleading? The proposed new one is actually very close.

Olaf
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/