generic interface real function vs real
in [Fortran]
|
Prev: Can someone know the time for a oo implemented F2003 complier release under the window platform?
Next: Derived type argument to subroutine
From: Dan Nagle on 18 Apr 2008 09:35 Hello, On 2008-04-18 08:31:28 -0400, "Craig Dedo" <cdedo(a)wi.rr.com> said: > Here is the relevant text from the current draft, 08-007r2. Reference > is sec. 12.4.3.4.5, par. 3. > [Begin quote] > Two dummy arguments are distinguishable if: > * One is a procedure and the other is a data object, > [End of quote] Prehaps easier than thumbing through the standard would be to go to J3's home page, click on "work plan", and note that UK-009 has an "Edits" paper passed. There is even a link to the edits paper. -- Cheers! Dan Nagle
From: Craig Dedo on 18 Apr 2008 12:23 "Dan Nagle" <dannagle(a)verizon.net> wrote in message news:2008041809352075249-dannagle(a)verizonnet... > Hello, > > On 2008-04-18 08:31:28 -0400, "Craig Dedo" <cdedo(a)wi.rr.com> said: >> Here is the relevant text from the current draft, 08-007r2. Reference is >> sec. 12.4.3.4.5, par. 3. >> [Begin quote] >> Two dummy arguments are distinguishable if: >> * One is a procedure and the other is a data object, >> [End of quote] > > Prehaps easier than thumbing through the standard > would be to go to J3's home page, click on "work plan", > and note that UK-009 has an "Edits" paper passed. > > There is even a link to the edits paper. > > -- > Cheers! > > Dan Nagle Thant's how I found it in the first place. However, just because an edits paper passed does not mean that the feature made it all the way into the current draft. It could have slipped between the cracks or gotten pulled at a later date. Features have been fully developed only to be pulled later. Remember Named Scratch Files? More recently, the BITS feature. So, I decided to check the current draft to make sure that the feature is still there. -- Craig Dedo 17130 W. Burleigh Place P. O. Box 423 Brookfield, WI 53008-0423 Voice: (262) 783-5869 Fax: (262) 783-5928 Mobile: (414) 412-5869 E-mail: <cdedo(a)wi.rr.com> or <craig(a)ctdedo.com>
From: Gerry Ford on 19 Apr 2008 18:27 "FX" <coudert(a)alussinan.org> wrote in message news:fu9kes$2fgf$1(a)nef.ens.fr... > [AS: Gerry, you might want to check on your newsreader settings; yours > posts often appear to me lacking newline characters, which makes them > quite hard to read. Also, it's easier if you use quoting the same as > others here, by prefixing each line you quote with a ">".] > >>> Anyone willing to confirm/infirm this? >> >> You'll find that "infirm" in common parlance is an adjective > > Indeed; I apologise. I was mislead by french where "infirm", in addition > to meaning ailing or disable, is also a verb that means something like > "contradict with a greater authority" (an appeal court would use it to > overrule the judgment of a lower court). Nonsense, it is I who apologizes. I made a completely garbled point that you could read as a criticism. The part about misidentification of kind in g95 is here: http://zaxfuuq.net/fortran196915.jpg . Those of us who speak English natively appreciate those who communicate in a foreign language. It would be a lot tougher for me in French. Jens se non declaration pas .... As to the antonym for confirm in english, I think you'd have to go with deny or disprove. I'm certain that infirm in french works better. -- "A belief in a supernatural source of evil is not necessary; men alone are quite capable of every wickedness." ~~ Joseph Conrad (1857-1924), novelist
From: John Harper on 20 Apr 2008 18:18
In article <1208643632_1356(a)news.newsgroups.com>, Gerry Ford <gerry(a)nowhere.ford> wrote: > >As to the antonym for confirm in english, I think you'd have to go with deny >or disprove. I'm certain that infirm in french works better. As well as deny and disprove, English offers rebut, confute and refute. -- John Harper, School of Mathematics, Statistics and Computer Science, Victoria University, PO Box 600, Wellington 6140, New Zealand e-mail john.harper(a)vuw.ac.nz phone (+64)(4)463 6780 fax (+64)(4)463 5045 |