|
Prev: 10.3, Thinkpad, Kpowersave, and no battery indiactor
Next: "hal-storage-mount-removable no <-- (action, result)
From: nomail-nospam on 20 Jan 2008 21:23 hal 32/64 bit oss-10.3.x86_64 on AMD-64 box While upgrading openSUSE-10.3-64bit to the latest "hal" package hal-0.5.10_git20071212-10.2.x86_64 Yast issued a dependency conflict to the effect that some programs require the 32 bit version of hal. I thought this might mean the latest i586 package which would be hal-0.5.10_git20071212-10.3.i586 Trying to upgrade "hal" to this produces a long list of conflicts. Meanwhile there IS a "hal-32bit" package in the distribution hal-32bit-0.5.9_git20070831-13.x86_64 which IS installed i.e. no grounds for any conflict. I'm a little confused.
From: Nikos Chantziaras on 20 Jan 2008 21:31 nomail-nospam(a)no.org wrote: > > hal 32/64 bit oss-10.3.x86_64 on AMD-64 box > While upgrading openSUSE-10.3-64bit to the latest "hal" package > hal-0.5.10_git20071212-10.2.x86_64 > > Yast issued a dependency conflict to the effect that some programs > require the 32 bit version of hal. I thought this might mean the latest > i586 package which would be > hal-0.5.10_git20071212-10.3.i586 > Trying to upgrade "hal" to this produces a long list of conflicts. > > > Meanwhile there IS a "hal-32bit" package in the distribution > hal-32bit-0.5.9_git20070831-13.x86_64 > > > which IS installed i.e. no grounds for any conflict. > > > I'm a little confused. When I did an Online Update yesterday, it also auto-selected the 32-bit version of hal. But there were no conflicts. It installed without any problems. So the problem you have is not "normal".
From: Darklight on 21 Jan 2008 04:15 nomail-nospam(a)no.org wrote: > > hal 32/64 bit oss-10.3.x86_64 on AMD-64 box > While upgrading openSUSE-10.3-64bit to the latest "hal" package > > hal-0.5.10_git20071212-10.2.x86_64 > > Yast issued a dependency conflict to the effect that some programs > require the 32 bit version of hal. I thought this might mean the > latest i586 package which would be > > hal-0.5.10_git20071212-10.3.i586 > > Trying to upgrade "hal" to this produces a long list of conflicts. > > > Meanwhile there IS a "hal-32bit" package in the distribution > > hal-32bit-0.5.9_git20070831-13.x86_64 > > > which IS installed i.e. no grounds for any conflict. > > > > I'm a little confused. what is the reason for upgrading hal?
From: nomail-nospam on 21 Jan 2008 09:57
Darklight wrote: > nomail-nospam(a)no.org wrote: > >> hal 32/64 bit oss-10.3.x86_64 on AMD-64 box >> While upgrading openSUSE-10.3-64bit to the latest "hal" package >> >> hal-0.5.10_git20071212-10.2.x86_64 >> >> Yast issued a dependency conflict to the effect that some programs >> require the 32 bit version of hal. I thought this might mean the >> latest i586 package which would be >> >> hal-0.5.10_git20071212-10.3.i586 >> >> Trying to upgrade "hal" to this produces a long list of conflicts. >> >> >> Meanwhile there IS a "hal-32bit" package in the distribution >> >> hal-32bit-0.5.9_git20070831-13.x86_64 >> >> >> which IS installed i.e. no grounds for any conflict. >> >> >> >> I'm a little confused. > > what is the reason for upgrading hal? See my other post. Basically I'm trying anything I can find to recover the ability to move pictures from my usb camera to disk. I even went back to my archived initial install image and it doesn't work on there either. Looks like upgrading to 10.3 or the concurrent migration to 64-bit has something to do with it. I just mounted it manually mount /dev/sdb1 /home/shared/sdb1 that at least takes the pressure off. http://www.suseforums.net/index.php?showtopic=39451 "Using 10.3 64bit and have a problem with usb sticks. When I click on to open it comes up with an error message:-" hal-storage-mount-removable no <--(action,result) "Found the answer to this question (in case anyone else has the same problem). Install the version of hal from here:-" http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/...enSUSE_Factory/ others: http://groups.google.com/group/alt.os.linux.suse/browse_thread/thread/639385f0eff00f6d |