|
Prev: Want unqualified domain
Next: How do I specify alternate sender address(From) when sending with /bin/mailx ?
From: h.stroph on 18 Apr 2008 15:43 In news:bill-F5B27F.14353918042008(a)news.det.sbcglobal.net, Bill Cole <bill(a)scconsult.com> typed: > Nowhere in that is there any mention of Sendmail, and if your mail > server *is* Sendmail ... The name of the program is sendmail, not Sendmail.
From: Bill Cole on 18 Apr 2008 19:38
In article <fuatln$9m8$1(a)aioe.org>, "h.stroph" <me(a)privacy.net> wrote: > In news:bill-F5B27F.14353918042008(a)news.det.sbcglobal.net, > Bill Cole <bill(a)scconsult.com> typed: > > > Nowhere in that is there any mention of Sendmail, and if your mail > > server *is* Sendmail ... > > The name of the program is sendmail, not Sendmail. Pedant :) There are 3 reasons I use the perverse capitalization: 1. I have surrendered to the mystification of people (like, I suspect, the poster I was responding to) who are confused by the Unix tradition of non-capitalization and particularly by the use of uncapitalized words as proper nouns. 2. These days, /usr/{sbin,lib,bin,libexec}/sendmail is fairly likely to not be Real Sendmail or even an MTA at all. A capitalized Sendmail clearly does not refer to some sendmail binary put in place as part of Postfix or an OS/distro maintainer's sendmail script that selects one of many different sendmail's depending on some config setting. 3. A capitalized Sendmail clearly does not refer narrowly to the sendmail binary. It lessens the possible misreading of a statement like "mail.local is part of sendmail." -- Now where did I hide that website... |