|
Prev: china wholesale cheap nike shoes,cheap nike,cheap nikes,nike jordans sneaker's,cheap nike air force 1s
Next: hay can you remove this post please it was a mistake thank you i was kind of desperate
From: Dave B on 20 Apr 2008 08:24 On Sunday 20 April 2008 12:21, Dave B wrote: >> the true format is >> >> find files ... -switches > > Where did you read that? From the standard man page: > > find [ -H | -L ] path ... [ operand_expression ... ] Ah ok, now I see what you mean. I never looked at "find" that way. Thanks! -- D.
From: Dan Mercer on 20 Apr 2008 12:33 "Dave B" <daveb(a)addr.invalid> wrote in message news:fuf5f5$pes$1(a)registered.motzarella.org... > On Saturday 19 April 2008 20:25, Dan Mercer wrote: > >>> time. If you mean how long since it was last modified, what you probably >>> are looking for is: >>> >>> find . -maxdepth 1 -ctime +1 -name file >> >> You demonstrate a common misconception about find - that the format is >> >> find dir -switches ... >> >> the true format is >> >> find files ... -switches > > Where did you read that? From the standard man page: > > find [ -H | -L ] path ... [ operand_expression ... ] find -H | -L are not standard find options - they may be Gnu find options, but I've never seen them. The synopsis for the standard find is find path-name-list [expression] Gnu find is a bit of a mess - if you're going to vary that far from the original concept, maybe you should reconsider renaming the program. Dan Mercer > > -- > D. >
From: Dave B on 20 Apr 2008 12:40 On Sunday 20 April 2008 18:33, Dan Mercer wrote: >> Where did you read that? From the standard man page: >> >> find [ -H | -L ] path ... [ operand_expression ... ] > > find -H | -L are not standard find options - they may be Gnu find options, > but I've never seen them. > The synopsis for the standard find is > > find path-name-list [expression] Uhm, no. I copied/pasted that directly from the SUSv3 standard, so I suppose that they *are* standard. -- D.
From: Chris Mattern on 21 Apr 2008 11:28 On 2008-04-20, SamL <slsamliu(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Apr 19, 6:18 am, Dave B <da...(a)addr.invalid> wrote: >> On Saturday 19 April 2008 11:49, Joachim Schmitz wrote: >> >> >> If by "old" you mean how long has it been since it was created, you >> >> can't (unless you save the information yourself) as UNIX doesn't >> >> store file creation time. If you mean how long since it was last >> >> modified, what you probably are looking for is: >> >> >> find . -maxdepth 1 -ctime +1 -name file >> > But that's days, not hours. >> >> Then I guess we need some math: >> >> if [ $(( $(date +%s) - $(stat -c %Z file) )) -gt 3600 ]; then >> ... >> fi >> >> (or %Y instead of %Z if we want the modification time) >> >> Or, with GNU find (adapted from Ed's): >> >> find . -maxdepth 1 -cmin +60 -name file >> >> (or -mmin if we want the modification time), and test if the command outputs >> something. >> >> All the above solutions need GNU tools. Not sure whether standard methods >> exist for doing the same thing. >> >> -- >> D. > > I am using AIX and unfortunately do not have the stat command, so I > tried the find command approach. > > It essentially works. Only one thing, it will return 0 even if there > is no files found satisfying the criteria. So > > find . -maxdepth 1 -cmin +60 -name file >/tmp.$$ > [[ -s /tmp.$$ ]] && echo "old" > Look, Ma, no temp files! [[ "$(find . -maxdepth 1 -cmin +60 -name file)" = "" ]] && echo "old" -- Christopher Mattern NOTICE Thank you for noticing this new notice Your noticing it has been noted And will be reported to the authorities
From: Kenny McCormack on 21 Apr 2008 11:37
In article <slrng0pcl9.gg3.syscjm(a)sumire.gwu.edu>, Chris Mattern <matternc(a)comcast.net> wrote: .... >Look, Ma, no temp files! > >[[ "$(find . -maxdepth 1 -cmin +60 -name file)" = "" ]] && echo "old" Let's count the minutes until one of the standards jockeys comes along and tells you that that requies GNU tools... |