i hate java script
in [JavaScript]
|
Prev: Closing parenthesis in function's definition followed by its call
Next: [node.js] Testing a javascript function on disk-based data
From: Gordon on 1 Jun 2010 04:03 On Jun 1, 7:19 am, Joe Nine <j...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > Frobernik wrote: > > Valeriu Bacuta wrote: > >> On May 31, 11:33 pm, David Mark <dmark.cins...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >>> On May 31, 5:29 pm, "silviu.ilie" <silviu.i...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > >>>> you ? > >>> Well, I talked to Javascript the other day and it hates you too. :) > > >> This could be the beginning of a beautiful friendship. > > > I hate to be predantic but its Javascript actually. Next you be saying PERL > > If you're going to be "pedantic" (not predantic) at least get it right, > it's JavaScript with a capital S. > > Predantic is what life was like before the dantic era. You all fail at pedantic. It's ECMAScript.
From: David Mark on 1 Jun 2010 04:43 On Jun 1, 4:03 am, Gordon <gordon.mc...(a)ntlworld.com> wrote: > On Jun 1, 7:19 am, Joe Nine <j...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > Frobernik wrote: > > > Valeriu Bacuta wrote: > > >> On May 31, 11:33 pm, David Mark <dmark.cins...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > >>> On May 31, 5:29 pm, "silviu.ilie" <silviu.i...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > >>>> you ? > > >>> Well, I talked to Javascript the other day and it hates you too. :) > > > >> This could be the beginning of a beautiful friendship. > > > > I hate to be predantic but its Javascript actually. Next you be saying PERL > > > If you're going to be "pedantic" (not predantic) at least get it right, > > it's JavaScript with a capital S. > > > Predantic is what life was like before the dantic era. > > You all fail at pedantic. It's ECMAScript. Nope. JavaScript and JScript are examples of proprietary ECMAScript implementations. The aggregate of ECMAScript implementations is normally referred to as Javascript.
From: Joe Nine on 1 Jun 2010 05:42 Gordon wrote: > On Jun 1, 7:19 am, Joe Nine <j...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >> Frobernik wrote: >>> Valeriu Bacuta wrote: >>>> On May 31, 11:33 pm, David Mark <dmark.cins...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> On May 31, 5:29 pm, "silviu.ilie" <silviu.i...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> you ? >>>>> Well, I talked to Javascript the other day and it hates you too. :) >>>> This could be the beginning of a beautiful friendship. >>> I hate to be predantic but its Javascript actually. Next you be saying PERL >> If you're going to be "pedantic" (not predantic) at least get it right, >> it's JavaScript with a capital S. >> >> Predantic is what life was like before the dantic era. > > You all fail at pedantic. It's ECMAScript. No, you fail at [being] pedantic. Or you fail at pedantism. Oh, and it's not ECMAScript, we're talking about JavaScript here.
From: Richard Cornford on 1 Jun 2010 06:05 On Jun 1, 10:42 am, Joe Nine wrote: > Gordon wrote: >> On Jun 1, 7:19 am, Joe Nine wrote: >>> Frobernik wrote: >>>> Valeriu Bacuta wrote: >>>>> On May 31, 11:33 pm, David Mark wrote: >>>>>> On May 31, 5:29 pm, silviu.ilie wrote: >>>>>>> you ? >>>>>> Well, I talked to Javascript the other day and it hates you >>>>>> too. :) >>>>> This could be the beginning of a beautiful friendship. >>>> I hate to be predantic but its Javascript actually. Next you be >>>> saying PERL >>> If you're going to be "pedantic" (not predantic) at least get it >>> right, it's JavaScript with a capital S. > >>> Predantic is what life was like before the dantic era. > >> You all fail at pedantic. It's ECMAScript. > > No, you fail at [being] pedantic. Or you fail at pedantism. Pedantry? > Oh, and it's not ECMAScript, we're talking about > JavaScript here. How could we know what we are talking about as the OP's Subject header uses 'java script' (and there is no "java script"), with no further explanation in the message body. Richard.
From: Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn on 1 Jun 2010 06:44
David Mark wrote: > "silviu.ilie" wrote: >> you ? > > Well, I talked to Javascript the other day and it hates you too. :) Please do not feed the trolls. TIA PointedEars |