From: Justin P. Mattock on
On 07/06/2010 06:57 AM, Corey Minyard wrote:
> Well, this patch is incorrect because IPMI_IO_ADDR_SPACE is zero. I'm
> not sure what your change is trying to accomplish, anyway. This is
> actually dead code from a previous change, I believe, and just needs to
> be removed. I did find that document at
> http://h21007.www2.hp.com/portal/download/files/unprot/hpspmi.pdf, not
> sure if there's a more reliable place to find it.
>
> -corey
>

cool thanks.. so it's dead code..I'll resend then with it removed.
as for the web address I don't know how you found that.. i.e. I spent at
least 45mins looking on that site for that *.pdf(searching gives nothing
etc..)

> On 07/05/2010 11:31 PM, Justin P. Mattock wrote:
>> Remove addr_space in exchange for two symbols that represent
>> mm = IPMI_MEM_ADDR_SPACE;
>> io = IPMI_IO_ADDR_SPACE;
>> then add a dev_warn printing information so that GCC doesn't give a
>> warning when building the kernel.
>> the original warning from GCC is this:
>>
>> CC [M] drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_intf.o
>> drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_intf.c: In function 'try_init_spmi':
>> drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_intf.c:2016:8: warning: variable
>> 'addr_space' set but not used
>>
>> And also the web address pointing to a *.pdf is no where to be
>> found(or atleast I couldn't
>> find it), so just use the web site itself(if somebody has the *.pdf
>> let me know I can change this).
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Justin P. Mattock<justinmattock(a)gmail.com>
>>
>> ---
>> drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_intf.c | 14 +++++++++-----
>> 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_intf.c
>> b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_intf.c
>> index 094bdc3..969e69a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_intf.c
>> +++ b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_intf.c
>> @@ -1965,8 +1965,7 @@ static int acpi_gpe_irq_setup(struct smi_info
>> *info)
>>
>> /*
>> * Defined at
>> - * http://h21007.www2.hp.com/dspp/files/unprotected/devresource/
>> - * Docs/TechPapers/IA64/hpspmi.pdf
>> + * http://h21007.www2.hp.com/portal/site/dspp
>> */
>> struct SPMITable {
>> s8 Signature[4];
>> @@ -2013,7 +2012,7 @@ struct SPMITable {
>> static __devinit int try_init_spmi(struct SPMITable *spmi)
>> {
>> struct smi_info *info;
>> - u8 addr_space;
>> + u8 mem, io;
>>
>> if (spmi->IPMIlegacy != 1) {
>> printk(KERN_INFO PFX "Bad SPMI legacy %d\n", spmi->IPMIlegacy);
>> @@ -2021,9 +2020,14 @@ static __devinit int try_init_spmi(struct
>> SPMITable *spmi)
>> }
>>
>> if (spmi->addr.space_id == ACPI_ADR_SPACE_SYSTEM_MEMORY)
>> - addr_space = IPMI_MEM_ADDR_SPACE;
>> + mem = IPMI_MEM_ADDR_SPACE;
>> else
>> - addr_space = IPMI_IO_ADDR_SPACE;
>> + io = IPMI_IO_ADDR_SPACE;
>> +
>> + if (mem || io) {
>> + dev_warn(info->dev, "spmi address space %d\n", mem ?: io);
>> + return 0;
>> + }
>>
>> info = kzalloc(sizeof(*info), GFP_KERNEL);
>> if (!info) {
>
>

Justin P. Mattock
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
From: Justin P. Mattock on

> Hello Justin.
>
> [...]
>> @@ -2021,10 +2020,6 @@ static __devinit int try_init_spmi(struct SPMITable
> *spmi)
>> }
>>
>> if (spmi->addr.space_id == ACPI_ADR_SPACE_SYSTEM_MEMORY)
>> - addr_space = IPMI_MEM_ADDR_SPACE;
>> - else
>> - addr_space = IPMI_IO_ADDR_SPACE;
>> -
>> info = kzalloc(sizeof(*info), GFP_KERNEL);
>> if (!info) {
>> printk(KERN_ERR PFX "Could not allocate SI data (3)\n");
>
> This looks like after applying this patch 'info = ...' will be part of
> if statement (without indent before 'info = ...')
>
> if (spmi->addr.space_id == ACPI_ADR_SPACE_SYSTEM_MEMORY)
> info = kzalloc(sizeof(*info), GFP_KERNEL);
>
> It's correct?
>
> Thanks
>

the original patch I dont think this is correct. a bit confusing with
the if(!info) at the bottom of this.
here's an updated version if it looks to be correct I'll resend if not
I'll redu:


---
drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_intf.c | 7 -------
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_intf.c
b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_intf.c
index 094bdc3..ef03ecd 100644
--- a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_intf.c
+++ b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_intf.c
@@ -2013,19 +2013,12 @@ struct SPMITable {
static __devinit int try_init_spmi(struct SPMITable *spmi)
{
struct smi_info *info;
- u8 addr_space;

if (spmi->IPMIlegacy != 1) {
printk(KERN_INFO PFX "Bad SPMI legacy %d\n", spmi->IPMIlegacy);
return -ENODEV;
}

- if (spmi->addr.space_id == ACPI_ADR_SPACE_SYSTEM_MEMORY)
- addr_space = IPMI_MEM_ADDR_SPACE;
- else
- addr_space = IPMI_IO_ADDR_SPACE;
-
- info = kzalloc(sizeof(*info), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!info) {
printk(KERN_ERR PFX "Could not allocate SI data (3)\n");
return -ENOMEM;
-- 1.7.1.rc1.21.gf3bd6

Thanks for the info on this..

Justin P. Mattock
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
From: Justin P. Mattock on
On 07/06/2010 01:14 PM, Sergey V. wrote:
> On Tuesday 06 of July 2010 22:30:00 Justin P. Mattock wrote:
>>
>>> Hello Justin.
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>> @@ -2021,10 +2020,6 @@ static __devinit int try_init_spmi(struct SPMITable
>>> *spmi)
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> if (spmi->addr.space_id == ACPI_ADR_SPACE_SYSTEM_MEMORY)
>>>> - addr_space = IPMI_MEM_ADDR_SPACE;
>>>> - else
>>>> - addr_space = IPMI_IO_ADDR_SPACE;
>>>> -
>>>> info = kzalloc(sizeof(*info), GFP_KERNEL);
>>>> if (!info) {
>>>> printk(KERN_ERR PFX "Could not allocate SI data (3)\n");
>>>
>>> This looks like after applying this patch 'info = ...' will be part of
>>> if statement (without indent before 'info = ...')
>>>
>>> if (spmi->addr.space_id == ACPI_ADR_SPACE_SYSTEM_MEMORY)
>>> info = kzalloc(sizeof(*info), GFP_KERNEL);
>>>
>>> It's correct?
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>
>> the original patch I dont think this is correct. a bit confusing with
>> the if(!info) at the bottom of this.
>> here's an updated version if it looks to be correct I'll resend if not
>> I'll redu:
>>
>>
>> ---
>> drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_intf.c | 7 -------
>> 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_intf.c
>> b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_intf.c
>> index 094bdc3..ef03ecd 100644
>> --- a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_intf.c
>> +++ b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_intf.c
>> @@ -2013,19 +2013,12 @@ struct SPMITable {
>> static __devinit int try_init_spmi(struct SPMITable *spmi)
>> {
>> struct smi_info *info;
>> - u8 addr_space;
>>
>> if (spmi->IPMIlegacy != 1) {
>> printk(KERN_INFO PFX "Bad SPMI legacy %d\n", spmi->IPMIlegacy);
>> return -ENODEV;
>> }
>>
>> - if (spmi->addr.space_id == ACPI_ADR_SPACE_SYSTEM_MEMORY)
>> - addr_space = IPMI_MEM_ADDR_SPACE;
>> - else
>> - addr_space = IPMI_IO_ADDR_SPACE;
>> -
>> - info = kzalloc(sizeof(*info), GFP_KERNEL);
>> if (!info) {
>> printk(KERN_ERR PFX "Could not allocate SI data (3)\n");
>> return -ENOMEM;
>> -- 1.7.1.rc1.21.gf3bd6
>>
>> Thanks for the info on this..
>>
>> Justin P. Mattock
>>
>
> Sorry, but I think that new patch is not correct.
>
> Why do you delete this row "info = kzalloc(sizeof(*info), GFP_KERNEL)"?
> There is the only one unused variable `addr_space`, so I think it should
> be removed, that's all.
>
> The following code is correct and not need to be changed:
>
> info = kzalloc(sizeof(*info), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!info) {
> printk(KERN_ERR PFX "Could not allocate SI data (3)\n");
>
> Please see below my patch.
> Thanks.
>
> ---
> Fix compile warning
> drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_intf.c: In function 'try_init_spmi':
> drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_intf.c:2016:8: warning: variable 'addr_space' set but
> not used
>
> Signed-off-by: Sergey V.<sftp.mtuci(a)gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_intf.c | 6 ------
> 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_intf.c
> b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_intf.c
> index 094bdc3..1f5f025 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_intf.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_intf.c
> @@ -2013,18 +2013,12 @@ struct SPMITable {
> static __devinit int try_init_spmi(struct SPMITable *spmi)
> {
> struct smi_info *info;
> - u8 addr_space;
>
> if (spmi->IPMIlegacy != 1) {
> printk(KERN_INFO PFX "Bad SPMI legacy %d\n", spmi->IPMIlegacy);
> return -ENODEV;
> }
>
> - if (spmi->addr.space_id == ACPI_ADR_SPACE_SYSTEM_MEMORY)
> - addr_space = IPMI_MEM_ADDR_SPACE;
> - else
> - addr_space = IPMI_IO_ADDR_SPACE;
> -
> info = kzalloc(sizeof(*info), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!info) {
> printk(KERN_ERR PFX "Could not allocate SI data (3)\n");


well if everybody agrees with your change then all good...

Justin P. Mattock
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
From: Justin P. Mattock on
what ever came about with this?

Justin P. Mattock
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
From: Corey Minyard on
On 07/07/2010 11:05 PM, Justin P. Mattock wrote:
> what ever came about with this?
>
> Justin P. Mattock
Well, Sergey sent a patch, but I don't think it was quite in a form that
can be taken. Do you want to resend per the standard rules?

-corey
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/