ixgbe: Fix return of invalid txq
in [Kernel]
|
From: Brandeburg, Jesse on 3 May 2010 17:10 putting davem on to: line... sorry for not including on first email. On Mon, 3 May 2010, Brandeburg, Jesse wrote: > Please consider commit fdd3d631cddad20ad9d3e1eb7dbf26825a8a121f for > inclusion in 2.6.32.y (it is already in 2.6.33.y) > > Here is the commit message, it fixes a panic on machines with a larger > number of cpus than ixgbe has tx queues (64). > > commit fdd3d631cddad20ad9d3e1eb7dbf26825a8a121f > Author: Krishna Kumar <krkumar2(a)in.ibm.com> > Date: Wed Feb 3 13:13:10 2010 +0000 > > ixgbe: Fix return of invalid txq > > a developer had complained of getting lots of warnings: > > "eth16 selects TX queue 98, but real number of TX queues is 64" > > http://www.mail-archive.com/e1000-devel(a)lists.sourceforge.net/msg02200.html > > As there was no follow up on that bug, I am submitting this > patch assuming that the other return points will not return > invalid txq's, and also that this fixes the bug (not tested). > > Signed-off-by: Krishna Kumar <krkumar2(a)in.ibm.com> > Signed-off-by: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg(a)intel.com> > Acked-by: Peter P Waskiewicz Jr <peter.p.waskiewicz.jr(a)intel.com> > Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher(a)intel.com> > Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem(a)davemloft.net> > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
From: David Miller on 3 May 2010 17:20 From: "Brandeburg, Jesse" <jesse.brandeburg(a)intel.com> Date: Mon, 3 May 2010 14:02:25 -0700 (Pacific Daylight Time) > putting davem on to: line... sorry for not including on first email. I'm fine with this. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
From: Greg KH on 7 May 2010 18:40 On Mon, May 03, 2010 at 01:56:57PM -0700, Brandeburg, Jesse wrote: > Please consider commit fdd3d631cddad20ad9d3e1eb7dbf26825a8a121f for > inclusion in 2.6.32.y (it is already in 2.6.33.y) > > Here is the commit message, it fixes a panic on machines with a larger > number of cpus than ixgbe has tx queues (64). > > commit fdd3d631cddad20ad9d3e1eb7dbf26825a8a121f This doesn't apply at all on the .32-stable tree, as the logic has changed there. Care to properly backport it if you really need it there? thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
From: Jeff Kirsher on 10 May 2010 01:20 On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 15:25, Greg KH <greg(a)kroah.com> wrote: > On Mon, May 03, 2010 at 01:56:57PM -0700, Brandeburg, Jesse wrote: >> Please consider commit fdd3d631cddad20ad9d3e1eb7dbf26825a8a121f for >> inclusion in 2.6.32.y (it is already in 2.6.33.y) >> >> Here is the commit message, it fixes a panic on machines with a larger >> number of cpus than ixgbe has tx queues (64). >> >> commit fdd3d631cddad20ad9d3e1eb7dbf26825a8a121f > > This doesn't apply at all on the .32-stable tree, as the logic has > changed there. Care to properly backport it if you really need it > there? > > thanks, > > greg k-h > -- Sorry Greg, I will work on getting you a patch against your stable tree before tomorrow night. -- Cheers, Jeff -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|
Pages: 1 Prev: [stable] ixgbe: Fix return of invalid txq Next: [PATCH] net: show stopped status in sysfs |