From: Randy Dunlap on
On Tue, 08 Jun 2010 17:25:57 +0100 Catalin Marinas wrote:

> The "select" statement in Kconfig files allows the enabling of options
> even if they have unmet direct dependencies (i.e. "depends on" expands
> to "no"). Currently, the "depends on" clauses are used in calculating
> the visibility but they do not affect the reverse dependencies in any
> way.
>
> The patch introduces additional tracking of the "depends on" statements
> and prints a warning on selecting an option if its direct dependencies
> are not met.


Hi Catalin,

Can these messages (on linux-next-20100611) be modified to include the
kconfig symbol that is causing them?

warning: (IP_VS_PROTO_ESP && NET && NETFILTER && IP_VS || IP_VS_PROTO_AH && NET && NETFILTER && IP_VS) selects IP_VS_PROTO_AH_ESP which has unmet direct dependencies (UNDEFINED)
warning: (SCx200_GPIO && SCx200 || PC8736x_GPIO && X86) selects NSC_GPIO which has unmet direct dependencies (X86_32)

Ah! It's the first symbol listed in each "phrase":

SCx200_GPIO and PC8736x_GPIO both have this problem.
(I haven't looked at IP_VS yet).

Jordan, is GEODE always 32-bit, so that some of these dependencies could be
cleaned up by using X86_32?

thanks,
---
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
From: Catalin Marinas on
On Fri, 2010-06-11 at 21:31 +0100, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On Tue, 08 Jun 2010 17:25:57 +0100 Catalin Marinas wrote:
>
> > The "select" statement in Kconfig files allows the enabling of options
> > even if they have unmet direct dependencies (i.e. "depends on" expands
> > to "no"). Currently, the "depends on" clauses are used in calculating
> > the visibility but they do not affect the reverse dependencies in any
> > way.
> >
> > The patch introduces additional tracking of the "depends on" statements
> > and prints a warning on selecting an option if its direct dependencies
> > are not met.
>
> Can these messages (on linux-next-20100611) be modified to include the
> kconfig symbol that is causing them?
>
> warning: (IP_VS_PROTO_ESP && NET && NETFILTER && IP_VS ||
> IP_VS_PROTO_AH && NET && NETFILTER && IP_VS) selects
> IP_VS_PROTO_AH_ESP which has unmet direct dependencies (UNDEFINED)
> warning: (SCx200_GPIO && SCx200 || PC8736x_GPIO && X86) selects
> NSC_GPIO which has unmet direct dependencies (X86_32)
>
> Ah! It's the first symbol listed in each "phrase":

(sorry for the delay)

It is usually the first symbol though kbuild does some expression
reduction when calculating the dependencies and I can't guarantee that
it is always the case. It's probably for someone who understands kbuild
better then me to make the output easier to read.

--
Catalin

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
From: Andres Salomon on
On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 13:31:19 -0700
Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap(a)oracle.com> wrote:

> On Tue, 08 Jun 2010 17:25:57 +0100 Catalin Marinas wrote:
>
> > The "select" statement in Kconfig files allows the enabling of options
> > even if they have unmet direct dependencies (i.e. "depends on" expands
> > to "no"). Currently, the "depends on" clauses are used in calculating
> > the visibility but they do not affect the reverse dependencies in any
> > way.
> >
> > The patch introduces additional tracking of the "depends on" statements
> > and prints a warning on selecting an option if its direct dependencies
> > are not met.
>
>
> Hi Catalin,
>
> Can these messages (on linux-next-20100611) be modified to include the
> kconfig symbol that is causing them?
>
> warning: (IP_VS_PROTO_ESP && NET && NETFILTER && IP_VS || IP_VS_PROTO_AH && NET && NETFILTER && IP_VS) selects IP_VS_PROTO_AH_ESP which has unmet direct dependencies (UNDEFINED)
> warning: (SCx200_GPIO && SCx200 || PC8736x_GPIO && X86) selects NSC_GPIO which has unmet direct dependencies (X86_32)
>
> Ah! It's the first symbol listed in each "phrase":
>
> SCx200_GPIO and PC8736x_GPIO both have this problem.
> (I haven't looked at IP_VS yet).

It's unclear why NSC_GPIO depends upon X86_32 (davej sent the patch,
699352c30da8525a). While geode stuff will probably only ever exist on x86,
there's nothing in the driver that's X86_32-specific.


>
> Jordan, is GEODE always 32-bit, so that some of these dependencies could be
> cleaned up by using X86_32?

Sadly, I don't think Jordan tracks this list any more.



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/