From: Stephen Rothwell on
Hi Steve,

After merging the cifs tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:

In file included from fs/cifs/cifsfs.c:50:
fs/cifs/fscache.h:49: error: expected identifier or '(' before '{' token

Caused by commit 07be494ba2f46852ec6d1faab8111f5179cc7bb4 ("cifs: define
server-level cache index objects and register them").
CONFIG_CIFS_FSCACHE is not defined in this build.

I have used the cifs tree from next-20100715 for today.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr(a)canb.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
From: Steve French on
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 6:51 PM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr(a)canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> Hi Steve,
>
> After merging the cifs tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
>
> In file included from fs/cifs/cifsfs.c:50:
> fs/cifs/fscache.h:49: error: expected identifier or '(' before '{' token
>
> Caused by commit 07be494ba2f46852ec6d1faab8111f5179cc7bb4 ("cifs: define
> server-level cache index objects and register them").
> CONFIG_CIFS_FSCACHE is not defined in this build.
>
> I have used the cifs tree from next-20100715 for today.

Thx. I have fixed this in cifs-2.6.git

There were three places where Suresh's fscache patch set for cifs
forgot ifdefs or misdefined the stub function (when fscache support is
turned off).

--
Thanks,

Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/