Prev: KVM: MMU: prefetch ptes when intercepted guest #PF
Next: [PATCH 06/17] kgdb,arm: Individual register get/set for arm
From: Mark Brown on 5 Aug 2010 10:50
On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 10:22:13PM +0800, Axel Lin wrote:
> 2010/8/5 Mark Brown <broonie(a)opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>:
> > but can I once more renew my request that you make some effort to
> > provide subject lines for your patches which are consistent with the
> > standard used for the area of the kernel you're submitting to?
> I think we have communication problem.
> I thought the subject "[PATCH 1/2] lp3971: remove unnecessary ret
> value checking in lp3971_i2c_write()"
> is pretty clear.
> Or do you mean something else?
In this case pretty much every regulator API patch has a subject line
starting "regulator: " but none of your patches do this, you have
created your own style which you use over all your patches.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/