From: AmirShayari on
hey people!
I bought a new scanner of canon, lide 25. the problme is that mandrive
control->scanners doesn't have the right driver to run it. (it ditect
that it is a canon scanner, but don't have it on his list of scanners)
I heard that I should update sane-backends to 1.0.17 and so I did (by
RPM named sane-backends-1.0.17-2.1.20060mdk.i586)
but still the mandrive control->scanners can't ditect the scanner.
what should I do?
thanks

From: Geranium on
AmirShayari(a)gmail.com wrote in alt.os.linux.mandrake:

> what should I do?
> thanks
Start read here:
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/2005-July/014027.html
From: ray on
On Sat, 23 Sep 2006 01:51:00 -0700, AmirShayari wrote:

> hey people!
> I bought a new scanner of canon, lide 25. the problme is that mandrive
> control->scanners doesn't have the right driver to run it. (it ditect
> that it is a canon scanner, but don't have it on his list of scanners)
> I heard that I should update sane-backends to 1.0.17 and so I did (by
> RPM named sane-backends-1.0.17-2.1.20060mdk.i586)
> but still the mandrive control->scanners can't ditect the scanner.
> what should I do?
> thanks

IMHO - the best solution: return it and get an Epson. Epson support for
Linux is far superior with the downloadable 'iscan' software.

From: Warren Post on
El Sat, 23 Sep 2006 01:51:00 -0700, AmirShayari escribi?:

> I bought a new scanner of canon, lide 25. the problme is that mandrive
> control->scanners doesn't have the right driver to run it. (it ditect that
> it is a canon scanner, but don't have it on his list of scanners) I heard
> that I should update sane-backends to 1.0.17 and so I did (by RPM named
> sane-backends-1.0.17-2.1.20060mdk.i586) but still the mandrive
> control->scanners can't ditect the scanner. what should I do?

I had the same problem last month. See my thread "CanoScan LiDE 25
found by sane-find-scanner but not scanimage" for the details, but what I
had to do was get the source for sane-backends (which is up to 1.0.18 by
now) and compile. Works fine.

--
Warren Post
Santa Rosa de Cop?n, Honduras
http://srcopan.vze.com/

From: AmirShayari on
ok so I installed (or think i did it) sane-backends-1.0.18, but still I
can't scan any thing.
ok, I'll give you the situation as it is:

the lsat lines in the commaned 'make' to sane-backends-1.0.18 were:
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/ashy/g/a/sane-backends-1.0.18/doc'
making all in po
make[1]: Entering directory `/home/ashy/g/a/sane-backends-1.0.18/po'
make[1]: Nothing to be done for 'all'
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/ashy/g/a/sane-backends-1.0.18/po'

at 'make install' they were:
make[1]: Entering directory `/home/ashy/g/a/sane-backends-1.0.18/po'
make[1]: Nothing to be done for `install'.
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/ashy/g/a/sane-backends-1.0.18/po'

does it mean I suceesed in the install?

and the output of 'sane-find-scanner' is:

# sane-find-scanner will now attempt to detect your scanner. If the
# result is different from what you expected, first make sure your
# scanner is powered up and properly connected to your computer.

# No SCSI scanners found. If you expected something different, make
sure that
# you have loaded a kernel SCSI driver for your SCSI adapter.

found USB scanner (vendor=0x04a9 [Canon], product=0x2220 [CanoScan],
chip=LM9832/3) at libusb:002:002
# Your USB scanner was (probably) detected. It may or may not be
supported by
# SANE. Try scanimage -L and read the backend's manpage.

# Not checking for parallel port scanners.

# Most Scanners connected to the parallel port or other proprietary
ports
# can't be detected by this program.

# You may want to run this program as root to find all devices. Once
you
# found the scanner devices, be sure to adjust access permissions as
# necessary.

and 'scanimage -L':
No scanners were identified. If you were expecting something different,
check that the scanner is plugged in, turned on and detected by the
sane-find-scanner tool (if appropriate). Please read the documentation
which came with this software (README, FAQ, manpages).

does it means something or do you need more outputs of some other
commends?
thanks alot!