From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt on
On Thu, 2010-07-22 at 11:21 -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> Need to add protection in linux/memblock.h, to prepare to include it in
> mm/page_alloc.c and mm/bootmem.c etc.

Not really no ... having the definitions shouldn't hurt whether memblock
is used or not, no ?

I'm going to keep that patch in the queue because it has one advantage
that you don't mention, which is to more easily catch attempts to
use those functions when CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK isn't set, but I'll update
the commit message.

Ben.

> Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai(a)kernel.org>
> ---
> include/linux/memblock.h | 3 +++
> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/memblock.h b/include/linux/memblock.h
> index 89749c4..4aaaf0d 100644
> --- a/include/linux/memblock.h
> +++ b/include/linux/memblock.h
> @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
> #define _LINUX_MEMBLOCK_H
> #ifdef __KERNEL__
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK
> /*
> * Logical memory blocks.
> *
> @@ -147,6 +148,8 @@ static inline unsigned long memblock_region_pages(const struct memblock_region *
> region++)
>
>
> +#endif /* CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK */
> +
> #endif /* __KERNEL__ */
>
> #endif /* _LINUX_MEMBLOCK_H */


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/