From: Justin Mattock on
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 7:42 PM, Justin P. Mattock
<justinmattock(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> memclear_highpage_flush has been changed over to
> zero_user_page for some time now. I think it's
> safe to say it's o.k. to remove all of it.
> (but correct me if I'm wrong).
>
> Signed-off-by: Justin P. Mattock <justinmattock(a)gmail.com>
>
>
> ---
> �include/linux/highmem.h | � �6 ------
> �1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/highmem.h b/include/linux/highmem.h
> index 74152c0..c77f913 100644
> --- a/include/linux/highmem.h
> +++ b/include/linux/highmem.h
> @@ -173,12 +173,6 @@ static inline void zero_user(struct page *page,
> � � � �zero_user_segments(page, start, start + size, 0, 0);
> �}
>
> -static inline void __deprecated memclear_highpage_flush(struct page *page,
> - � � � � � � � � � � � unsigned int offset, unsigned int size)
> -{
> - � � � zero_user(page, offset, size);
> -}
> -
> �#ifndef __HAVE_ARCH_COPY_USER_HIGHPAGE
>
> �static inline void copy_user_highpage(struct page *to, struct page *from,
> --
> 1.6.5.2.180.gc5b3e
>
>

no response on this yet..
is it safe to say this can go in
my reject pile?

--
Justin P. Mattock
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/