From: Nick Friend on 28 Apr 2010 08:08 Mathias Thanks, I'll look at this. But really where the problem lies is in the editing. We already have a 3rd party OCX to use for viewing and printing, and that's much more lightweight than Word itself, so that part is pretty well controlled. The big issue is the editing... how to make it as fast as possible and error trapping when Word (or the user!) doesn't cooperate. Nick
From: Jean-Pierre Maertens on 28 Apr 2010 10:04 I had the same problems years ago. I have used TE-control (a 3th party product) and it has the look and feel of MS-Word, the users are very pleased with it and it is not very expensive. Greg Garza and I have written a VO wrapper for this control, so you can use it just as a custom control. greetings, -- Jean-Pierre Maertens
From: Geoff Schaller on 28 Apr 2010 19:19 Richard. Actually no. RTF probably has 5% of the functionality people want now with their docs. Also, the specification is rapidly becoming docx etc because of the implicit compression available. Especially if the document is data linked to some sql server etc and has prefilled fields etc, rtf just isn't going to cut the mustard. Geoff "richard.townsendrose" <richard.townsendrose(a)googlemail.com> wrote in message news:620eb17f-9468-4ac6-96b3-29ac61ac822f(a)j17g2000yqa.googlegroups.com: > Nick > > why use ms word ??? ... why not use RTF ... > > it has 99% of what people need ... > > we use rtf memo fields .. i have always wanted to add the rtf menu and > toolbar, but never got round to it ... > > see http://www.tdoc.org.uk/Ver5/QL_G_12.JPG > > what our users like is to be able to see all the other related > data ... like who had it when in reply to what, how it fits into a > contract claim [e.g. keywords] > > Richard
From: Mathias on 29 Apr 2010 01:56 Hi Nick, in my excel-internet explorer hack, speed has never been an issue. Its the same speed that you get when navigating to a word document in internet explorer. The difficulti lies in getting access to the automation object as it's internet explorer that starts it instead of your application. Mathias On 28 Apr, 14:08, Nick Friend <nicktek...(a)googlemail.com> wrote: > Mathias > > Thanks, I'll look at this. But really where the problem lies is in the > editing. We already have a 3rd party OCX to use for viewing and > printing, and that's much more lightweight than Word itself, so that > part is pretty well controlled. > > The big issue is the editing... how to make it as fast as possible and > error trapping when Word (or the user!) doesn't cooperate. > > Nick
From: Nick Friend on 29 Apr 2010 04:32 Ah, I'd misunderstood.... so you're using IE as the container for the embedding.. I'll have to investigate that. But after further discussions yesterday, it looks as though there is the possibility that we could use a 3rd party tool for editing as well, as long as it's highly compatible with Word... I've started another thread on this. Thanks Nick On 29 Apr, 06:56, Mathias <mathias.hakans...(a)consultec.se> wrote: > Hi Nick, > > in my excel-internet explorer hack, speed has never been an issue. Its > the same speed that you get when navigating to a word document in > internet explorer. The difficulti lies in getting access to the > automation object as it's internet explorer that starts it instead of > your application. > > Mathias > > On 28 Apr, 14:08, Nick Friend <nicktek...(a)googlemail.com> wrote: > > > > > Mathias > > > Thanks, I'll look at this. But really where the problem lies is in the > > editing. We already have a 3rd party OCX to use for viewing and > > printing, and that's much more lightweight than Word itself, so that > > part is pretty well controlled. > > > The big issue is the editing... how to make it as fast as possible and > > error trapping when Word (or the user!) doesn't cooperate. > > > Nick- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text -
First
|
Prev
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 Prev: Data Encryption and Non-English language issues Next: Setfilter and date |