From: alberto on
Typical layout:

- vocal quartet, no instruments
- live concerts
- miking from 2 to 4 meters
- small churches, concert halls or theaters, in either case rarely
exceeding 300-500 seats; now and then there is quite much of a
reverberation, but usually it's rather dry instead

Which type of mic should I buy:

- omni
- cardioid

And do I want

- flat frequency response, or
- a bass roll-off filter?

I'd say cardioid, also because I'm interested in the music not in the
audience, and because cardioids let me play more with different stereo
miking arrangements. But some cardioids have a roll-off I can't take
out (I don't have a mixer), so it's also a matter whether the roll-off
is desirable or not.

Thank you in advance
Alberto

From: Paul Stamler on
"alberto" <alblonghi(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1132304913.156782.225570(a)g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> - vocal quartet, no instruments
> - live concerts
> - miking from 2 to 4 meters
> - small churches, concert halls or theaters, in either case rarely
> exceeding 300-500 seats; now and then there is quite much of a
> reverberation, but usually it's rather dry instead

> I'd say cardioid, also because I'm interested in the music not in the
> audience, and because cardioids let me play more with different stereo
> miking arrangements.

I'd agree.

> But some cardioids have a roll-off I can't take
> out (I don't have a mixer), so it's also a matter whether the roll-off
> is desirable or not.

It's not; the rolloff is there for close-up use, to reduce bass-boost caused
by proximity effect. You may want to roll off bass to get rid of hall
rumble, but that'd be at a frequency lower than the bass rolloffs in many
cardioid mics. As a rule of thumb, if the mic is flat down to 70Hz you
should be okay, but a mic that's flat to a lower frequency couldn't hurt,
provided you'll have the chance to filter out rumble after recording, during
editing.

Peace,
Paul


From: Scott Dorsey on
In article <1132304913.156782.225570(a)g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
alberto <alblonghi(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>Typical layout:
>
>- vocal quartet, no instruments
>- live concerts
>- miking from 2 to 4 meters
>- small churches, concert halls or theaters, in either case rarely
>exceeding 300-500 seats; now and then there is quite much of a
>reverberation, but usually it's rather dry instead
>
>Which type of mic should I buy:
>
>- omni
>- cardioid
>
>And do I want
>
>- flat frequency response, or
>- a bass roll-off filter?
>
>I'd say cardioid, also because I'm interested in the music not in the
>audience, and because cardioids let me play more with different stereo
>miking arrangements. But some cardioids have a roll-off I can't take
>out (I don't have a mixer), so it's also a matter whether the roll-off
>is desirable or not.


Is this for recording or PA? What are these people singing and in
what style?

If it's for recording, I would suggest starting with an ORTF pair, which
means you'll need cardioids. It may not be the best configuration in
any one hall, but it's usable in any hall.

Whether the roll-off is desireable depends on the room and on your
group. If you have a real basso profundo who can project from his
chest, you can actually have substantial low end.
--scott
--
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."
From: Ty Ford on
On Fri, 18 Nov 2005 04:08:33 -0500, alberto wrote
(in article <1132304913.156782.225570(a)g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>):

> Typical layout:
>
> - vocal quartet, no instruments
> - live concerts
> - miking from 2 to 4 meters
> - small churches, concert halls or theaters, in either case rarely
> exceeding 300-500 seats; now and then there is quite much of a
> reverberation, but usually it's rather dry instead
>
> Which type of mic should I buy:
>
> - omni
> - cardioid
>
> And do I want
>
> - flat frequency response, or
> - a bass roll-off filter?
>
> I'd say cardioid, also because I'm interested in the music not in the
> audience, and because cardioids let me play more with different stereo
> miking arrangements. But some cardioids have a roll-off I can't take
> out (I don't have a mixer), so it's also a matter whether the roll-off
> is desirable or not.
>
> Thank you in advance
> Alberto
>

2-4 meters is way too far away. You'll never get "dry sound" at that
distance. Is this for PA amplification or recording or both?

Regards,

Ty Ford



-- Ty Ford's equipment reviews, audio samples, rates and other audiocentric
stuff are at www.tyford.com

From: alberto on
Scott Dorsey ha scritto:

> Is this for recording or PA? What are these people singing and in
> what style?

It's mostly for recording period polyphonic music (14th to 16th
century), sacred or secular. We are two male and two female voices. Our
color is quite bright. Rarely sung, in concert, any note below F# 88Hz.

> Whether the roll-off is desireable depends on the room and on your
> group. If you have a real basso profundo who can project from his
> chest, you can actually have substantial low end.

We don't: I'm the bass, no a baritone really... Not really good at that
either... Last thing I need is having my notes below A110 damped by the
mike.

I was thinking about the Microtrack and Core Sound's binaurals. With
those omnis I have no roll off, but no ORTF either. CS cardiodids do
have the roll off. I know, no pro audio, but some very portable and
compact and unexpensive equipment hopefully a step above the MD,
running a noise-free 16/44 unattended for some 3 hours (turn on before
people get into the hall, turn off when the concert is over).

Otherwise, if I must go with cardioids: the Microtrack, the NT6 (or
your suggested mike), a phantom/preamp, cables, cable adapter... More
expensive and less portable equipment. Or, can you suggest a mike from
this list (one that is priced reasonably given the rest of the
equipment), to spare me the purchase of a preamp:

http://www.m-audio.com/index.php?do=support.faq&ID=7fb377f3ef962038a26bc5c2291bafc1

Or a neutral alternative to the CS miniature cardioids?

Thank you
Alberto