|
Prev: PERL to mean what 'perldoc perl' says is wrong? (was: Re: perlshould be improved and perl6)
Next: Can "perldoc" take input from a pipe?
From: nolo contendere on 16 Apr 2008 16:34 On Apr 16, 1:04 pm, Marek <ms...(a)podiuminternational.org> wrote: > Sorry to bother this group again! Now my script is nearly finished. > Only one little problem is left: I am imaging the perl "rename" like > the shell "mv". Is there a difference? My rename is not working as > intended: > > could not rename your pix from: > /Users/marekstepanek/Documents/webpages/www.munich-taxis.de/ > pix/fotos/thumbnails/tn_munich28.jpg > to > /Users/marekstepanek/Documents/webpages/www.munich-taxis.de/ > pix_out/fotos/thumbnails/tn_munich28.jpg > check out File::Copy::move()
From: Dr.Ruud on 20 Apr 2008 04:50
Ted Zlatanov schreef: > Lawrence Statton wrote: >> You young'ns don't remember the great whitespace shortage of '03 >> ... all the new python people were using all the whitespace that >> could be produced -- a lot of programmers had to go mining in old >> COBOL and FORTRAN projects of their college days just to get enough >> whitespace to keep our variables separated. > > Perl, fortunately, was not affected by this shortage by design :) Per 6 is too modern for that: "Whitespace is in general required between any keyword and any opening bracket that is not introducing a subscript or function arguments. Any keyword followed directly by parentheses will be taken as a function call instead." sub if { exit 1 } -- Affijn, Ruud "Gewoon is een tijger." |