From: Ha, Tristram on
Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Feb 2010 15:28:29 -0800
> "Ha, Tristram" <Tristram.Ha(a)Micrel.Com> wrote:
>
>> From: Tristram Ha <Tristram.Ha(a)micrel.com>
>>
>> Add PCI vendor and device ids for Micrel KSZ8841/2 PCI devices.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tristram Ha <Tristram.Ha(a)micrel.com> ---
>> This is a resubmission of the Micrel KSZ8841/2 PCI Ethernet driver.
>>
>> --- linux-2.6.33-rc5.old/include/linux/pci_ids.h 2010-01-21
15:31:35.000000000 -0800
>> +++ linux-2.6.33-rc5.new/include/linux/pci_ids.h 2010-01-29
10:38:53.000000000 -0800 @@ -2199,6
>> +2199,12 @@ #define PCI_VENDOR_ID_NETCELL 0x169c
>> #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_REVOLUTION 0x0044
>>
>> +#define PCI_VENDOR_ID_MICREL_KS 0x16c6
>> +#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_MICREL_KS8692 0x8692
>> +#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_MICREL_KS8695 0x8695
>> +#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_MICREL_KS8841 0x8841
>> +#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_MICREL_KS8842 0x8842
>> +
>> #define PCI_VENDOR_ID_CENATEK 0x16CA
>> #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_CENATEK_IDE 0x0001
>>
>
> Current practice is to NOT update this file and instead keep constants
in the individual driver.

It seems I received conflicted recommendation from Alan Cox:

>> >> +#define PCI_VENDOR_ID_KS884X 0x16C6
>> >> +#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_KS8841 0x8841
>> >> +#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_KS8842 0x8842
>> >
>> > Those belong in the pci device id header.
>> >
>> >
>>
>> I do not quite understand your suggestion. Do I need to put those
IDs
>> in one of the kernel headers?
>
> Into include/linux/pci_ids.h

So I do not need to update pci_ids.h with even the PCI vendor ID?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/