From: luna on
im really at a loss with this one still, driving me insane

we can mail all domains no problem
one particular domain cannot reply to us

they are running 2000 we are running 2007

ive checked the filter logs and they are getting through

ive disabled all filters, added anonymous access to the smtp connectors -
you name it i've tried it,

in the logs i get

X-EXPS GSSAPI
334 <authentication response>,
334 <authentication response>,
*,,Inbound Negotiate failed because of LogonDenied
454 4.7.0 Temporary authentication failure,

when they send to our server

they also get an NDR that says "This message was rejected due to the current
administrative policy by the destination server."

however they can telnet our server fine, and send email from that

but mail just queues up at their server for us, obviously i cant check their
settings (their server is sending mail to other domains no problem at all)
, is there any pointers i should give them as to what the problem may be ?


theres nothing else i can try - at a total loss

mark





From: luna on
ok
think its working but ive had to set the default receive connector to have
basic authentication only
and anonymous access, with nothing else checked - is this good practice ?
the server is a hub server connected to the internet

mark





"luna" <luna_s(a)themoon.com> wrote in message
news:GtOdnUPuwJRo2KbbnZ2dnUVZ8silnZ2d(a)giganews.com...
> im really at a loss with this one still, driving me insane
>
> we can mail all domains no problem
> one particular domain cannot reply to us
>
> they are running 2000 we are running 2007
>
> ive checked the filter logs and they are getting through
>
> ive disabled all filters, added anonymous access to the smtp connectors -
> you name it i've tried it,
>
> in the logs i get
>
> X-EXPS GSSAPI
> 334 <authentication response>,
> 334 <authentication response>,
> *,,Inbound Negotiate failed because of LogonDenied
> 454 4.7.0 Temporary authentication failure,
>
> when they send to our server
>
> they also get an NDR that says "This message was rejected due to the
> current administrative policy by the destination server."
>
> however they can telnet our server fine, and send email from that
>
> but mail just queues up at their server for us, obviously i cant check
> their settings (their server is sending mail to other domains no problem
> at all)
> , is there any pointers i should give them as to what the problem may be ?
>
>
> theres nothing else i can try - at a total loss
>
> mark
>
>
>
>
>


From: Leif Pedersen [MVP] on
Hi,

You need anonymous access if you want to receive mails from all internet
hosts.

Leif

"luna" <luna_s(a)themoon.com> wrote in message
news:3KGdnQVlRfgDy6bbRVnysQA(a)giganews.com...
> ok
> think its working but ive had to set the default receive connector to have
> basic authentication only
> and anonymous access, with nothing else checked - is this good practice ?
> the server is a hub server connected to the internet
>
> mark
>
>
>
>
>
> "luna" <luna_s(a)themoon.com> wrote in message
> news:GtOdnUPuwJRo2KbbnZ2dnUVZ8silnZ2d(a)giganews.com...
>> im really at a loss with this one still, driving me insane
>>
>> we can mail all domains no problem
>> one particular domain cannot reply to us
>>
>> they are running 2000 we are running 2007
>>
>> ive checked the filter logs and they are getting through
>>
>> ive disabled all filters, added anonymous access to the smtp connectors -
>> you name it i've tried it,
>>
>> in the logs i get
>>
>> X-EXPS GSSAPI
>> 334 <authentication response>,
>> 334 <authentication response>,
>> *,,Inbound Negotiate failed because of LogonDenied
>> 454 4.7.0 Temporary authentication failure,
>>
>> when they send to our server
>>
>> they also get an NDR that says "This message was rejected due to the
>> current administrative policy by the destination server."
>>
>> however they can telnet our server fine, and send email from that
>>
>> but mail just queues up at their server for us, obviously i cant check
>> their settings (their server is sending mail to other domains no problem
>> at all)
>> , is there any pointers i should give them as to what the problem may be
>> ?
>>
>>
>> theres nothing else i can try - at a total loss
>>
>> mark
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>