From: David Rientjes on
On Tue, 8 Jun 2010, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:

> Now has_intersects_mems_allowed() has own thread iterate logic, but
> it should use while_each_thread().
>
> It slightly improve the code readability.
>

These cleanups should be done on top of my oom killer rewrite instead,
please work with others in their work instead of getting in the way of it
time and time again.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
From: Minchan Kim on
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 08:35:15PM +0900, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
>
> Now has_intersects_mems_allowed() has own thread iterate logic, but
> it should use while_each_thread().
>
> It slightly improve the code readability.
>
> Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro(a)jp.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim(a)gmail.com>
--
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
From: David Rientjes on
On Thu, 17 Jun 2010, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:

>
> Now has_intersects_mems_allowed() has own thread iterate logic, but
> it should use while_each_thread().
>
> It slightly improve the code readability.
>
> Reviewed-by: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim(a)gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro(a)jp.fujitsu.com>

I disagree that the renaming of the variables is necessary, please simply
change the while (tsk != start) to use while_each_thread(tsk, start);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
From: KOSAKI Motohiro on
> On Thu, 17 Jun 2010, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
>
> >
> > Now has_intersects_mems_allowed() has own thread iterate logic, but
> > it should use while_each_thread().
> >
> > It slightly improve the code readability.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim(a)gmail.com>
> > Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro(a)jp.fujitsu.com>
>
> I disagree that the renaming of the variables is necessary, please simply
> change the while (tsk != start) to use while_each_thread(tsk, start);

This is common naming rule of while_each_thread(). please grep.



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
From: David Rientjes on
On Mon, 21 Jun 2010, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:

> > I disagree that the renaming of the variables is necessary, please simply
> > change the while (tsk != start) to use while_each_thread(tsk, start);
>
> This is common naming rule of while_each_thread(). please grep.
>

I disagree, there's no sense in substituting variable names like "tsk" for
`p' and removing a very clear and obvious "start" task: it doesn't improve
code readability.

I'm in favor of changing the while (tsk != start) to
while_each_thread(tsk, start) which is very trivial to understand and much
more readable than while_each_thread(p, tsk). With the latter, it's not
clear whether `p' or "tsk" is the iterator and which is the constant.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/