From: Mathieu Desnoyers on
PEM:
o Would it be possible to make this bisectable as follows?

a. Insert a new patch after current patch 4/6 that
defines destroy_rcu_head_on_stack(),
init_rcu_head_on_stack(), and init_rcu_head() with
their !CONFIG_DEBUG_OBJECTS_RCU_HEAD definitions.

This patch performs this transition.

Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers(a)efficios.com>
CC: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com>
CC: David S. Miller <davem(a)davemloft.net>
CC: akpm(a)linux-foundation.org
CC: mingo(a)elte.hu
CC: laijs(a)cn.fujitsu.com
CC: dipankar(a)in.ibm.com
CC: josh(a)joshtriplett.org
CC: dvhltc(a)us.ibm.com
CC: niv(a)us.ibm.com
CC: tglx(a)linutronix.de
CC: peterz(a)infradead.org
CC: rostedt(a)goodmis.org
CC: Valdis.Kletnieks(a)vt.edu
CC: dhowells(a)redhat.com
CC: eric.dumazet(a)gmail.com
CC: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan(a)gmail.com>
---
include/linux/rcupdate.h | 8 ++++++++
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)

Index: linux.trees.git/include/linux/rcupdate.h
===================================================================
--- linux.trees.git.orig/include/linux/rcupdate.h 2010-03-29 09:43:35.000000000 -0400
+++ linux.trees.git/include/linux/rcupdate.h 2010-03-29 09:57:09.000000000 -0400
@@ -83,6 +83,14 @@ extern void rcu_scheduler_starting(void)
(ptr)->next = NULL; (ptr)->func = NULL; \
} while (0)

+static inline void init_rcu_head_on_stack(struct rcu_head *head)
+{
+}
+
+static inline void destroy_rcu_head_on_stack(struct rcu_head *head)
+{
+}
+
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC

extern struct lockdep_map rcu_lock_map;

--
Mathieu Desnoyers
OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/