From: Lin Ming on 18 May 2010 22:10 On Wed, 2010-05-19 at 02:38 +0800, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote: > On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 01:45:02AM +0000, Lin Ming wrote: > ... > > +int perf_event_register_pmu(struct pmu *pmu) > > +{ > > + struct pmu *tmp; > > + int ret = 1; > > + > > + rcu_read_lock(); > > + list_for_each_entry_rcu(tmp, &pmus, entry) { > > + if (tmp->id == pmu->id) { > > + ret = 0; > > + goto err; > > Hi Ming, is it supposed to get out in locked state? > I mean imbalanced rcu_read_lock somehow suspicicous ;) Ah, yes, that's real bug. I'll fix it. Thanks for review. > > > + } > > + } > > + rcu_read_unlock(); > > + > > + spin_lock(&pmus_lock); > > + list_add_tail_rcu(&pmu->entry, &pmus); > > + spin_unlock(&pmus_lock); > > + > > +err: > > + return ret; > > +} > > + > ... > > -- Cyrill -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|
Pages: 1 Prev: s3c-fb: enable fimd driver for s5pv210. Next: [PATCH v2 4/5] perf probe: Don't call die() |