Prev: proctool equivalent for solaris 9 ?
Next: Automount NFS on Solaris 8 Broken ?
From: Dragan Cvetkovic on 25 Feb 2005 13:50
Hi,

I have just downloaded rsc-2.2.3 and started
/usr/platform/.../rsc/rsc-config to configure RSC card on our Sun-Fire 280R
(that runs Solaris 10) and noticed that it seems to mix BSD and SYSV
echos. Here is the screen output:

\nModem Setup\n-----------\n- Modem disabled, ppp disabled\n
Is this correct (y|n): y


\nSerial Port Setup\n-----------------\n- Serial port disabled\n
Is this correct (y|n): y


[snip]

Now, I also remember that rsc-2.2.2 that was installed on a Solaris 9
machine didn't have that problems, so it looks like a bug in the new
version (or some incompatibility with Solaris 10).

Bye, Dragan

--
Dragan Cvetkovic,

To be or not to be is true. G. Boole No it isn't. L. E. J. Brouwer

!!! Sender/From address is bogus. Use reply-to one !!!
From: Dragan Cvetkovic on 25 Feb 2005 13:56
Dragan Cvetkovic <me(a)privacy.net> writes:

> Hi,
>
> I have just downloaded rsc-2.2.3 and started
> /usr/platform/.../rsc/rsc-config to configure RSC card on our Sun-Fire 280R
> (that runs Solaris 10) and noticed that it seems to mix BSD and SYSV
> echos. Here is the screen output:
>
> \nModem Setup\n-----------\n- Modem disabled, ppp disabled\n
> Is this correct (y|n): y
>
>
> \nSerial Port Setup\n-----------------\n- Serial port disabled\n
> Is this correct (y|n): y
>
>
> [snip]
>
> Now, I also remember that rsc-2.2.2 that was installed on a Solaris 9
> machine didn't have that problems, so it looks like a bug in the new
> version (or some incompatibility with Solaris 10).

Actually, rsc-2.2.3 rsc-config doesn't show that behaviour on Solaris 9,
just tested it.

Dragan

--
Dragan Cvetkovic,

To be or not to be is true. G. Boole No it isn't. L. E. J. Brouwer

!!! Sender/From address is bogus. Use reply-to one !!!
From: Fredrik Lundholm on 28 Feb 2005 15:43
In article <lmoee8wjrk.fsf(a)privacy.net>,
Dragan Cvetkovic <dragan_usenet(a)gmx.net> wrote:

>Actually, rsc-2.2.3 rsc-config doesn't show that behaviour on Solaris 9,
>just tested it.

I installed it on three machines last friday and it seemed to work as
expected under Solaris 9, which mirrors your observations.

/wfr
Fredrik



--
Fredrik Lundholm
dol @ ce.chalmers.se

 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: proctool equivalent for solaris 9 ?
Next: Automount NFS on Solaris 8 Broken ?