Prev: Bug#587665: Safety of early boot init of /dev/random seed
Next: xiangyanh5
From: Jeff Garzik on 1 Aug 2010 19:50
On 06/25/2010 09:02 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Make the following changes to prepare for NCQ command completion
> update. Changes made by this patch don't cause any functional
> difference.
>
> * sata_fsl_host_intr(): rename the local variable qc_active to
> done_mask as that's what it is.
>
> * mv_process_crpb_response(): restructure if clause for easier update.
>
> * nv_adma_interrupt(): drop unnecessary error variable.
>
> * nv_swncq_sdbfis(): drop unnecessary nr_done and return 0 on success.
> Typo fix.
>
> * nv_swncq_dmafis(): drop unused return value and return void.
>
> * nv_swncq_host_interrupt(): drop unnecessary return value handling.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo<tj(a)kernel.org>
> Cc: Ashish Kalra<ashish.kalra(a)freescale.com>
> Cc: Saeed Bishara<saeed(a)marvell.com>
> Cc: Mark Lord<liml(a)rtr.ca>
> Cc: Robert Hancock<hancockr(a)shaw.ca>
> ---
> So, something like this. I tested both flavors of sata_nv but don't
> have access to sata_mv or sata_fsl, but the conversion is pretty
> straight forward and failures should be pretty easy to catch.

applied


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
From: Tejun Heo on 2 Aug 2010 03:20
Hello, Jeff.

On 08/02/2010 01:47 AM, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>> So, something like this. I tested both flavors of sata_nv but don't
>> have access to sata_mv or sata_fsl, but the conversion is pretty
>> straight forward and failures should be pretty easy to catch.
>
> applied

Are you planning on applying the second patch too?

Thanks.

--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
From: Jeff Garzik on 4 Aug 2010 00:30
On 08/02/2010 03:18 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello, Jeff.
>
> On 08/02/2010 01:47 AM, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>>> So, something like this. I tested both flavors of sata_nv but don't
>>> have access to sata_mv or sata_fsl, but the conversion is pretty
>>> straight forward and failures should be pretty easy to catch.
>>
>> applied
>
> Are you planning on applying the second patch too?

sata_mv is behaving weirdly in 2.6.35 + these patches, on the older 6081
chip, embedded in a Dell server box. Looking into it...

Jeff



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: Bug#587665: Safety of early boot init of /dev/random seed
Next: xiangyanh5