From: Ian Collins on
David Combs wrote:
> Getting jittery about my old disks.
>
> 1: must I mirror on exactly identical disks?
>
No, but the slices you mirror should be the same size.

> 2: software-mirroring: blade100 fast enough? or **MUCH** better
> with ultra 25?
>
Root mirror on a Blade 100 will be OK, anything is better with a U25!

> 3: Is there anything in 10 or 11, over 9, that makes
> it easier (or anything)?
>
ZFS for anything other than root (in current builds, ZFS on the way).

> 4: Stepson has mirroring on his pc -- apparantely took
> months to acquire needed hardware, and in all
> spent something like $5K.
>
> I assume there's no such problem on solaris sparc?
>
None,

--
Ian Collins.
From: Richard B. Gilbert on
David Combs wrote:
> Getting jittery about my old disks.
>
> 1: must I mirror on exactly identical disks?

I don't know that it's REQUIRED. It is, however an excellent idea and
pretty much guarantees success on the first try.

>
> 2: software-mirroring: blade100 fast enough? or **MUCH** better
> with ultra 25?

The software part of mirroring is just issuing two writes instead of
one. Remember that everything must be written to BOTH disks.

>
> 3: Is there anything in 10 or 11, over 9, that makes
> it easier (or anything)?
>
> 4: Stepson has mirroring on his pc -- apparantely took
> months to acquire needed hardware, and in all
> spent something like $5K.
>
I could do it for less! Adaptec has, or had, an EIDE RAID controller
that does RAID 1 (mirror) or RAID 5. Today would cost $300-$500
depending on the size of disks employed. Probably a lot closer to $300.
That figure does not include the cost of the PC itself; just the disks
and controller.

Doing it with SCSI could get REALLY expensive. The disks themselves are
expensive and the controllers aren't cheap either!




> I assume there's no such problem on solaris sparc?
>
>
> Thanks!
>
> David
>
>