shell script - resque
in [Shell]
|
From: Ben Bacarisse on 1 Jun 2010 06:21 kaushal <kaushalshriyan(a)gmail.com> writes: <snip> > I did update-rc.d resque start 98 2 3 4 5 . stop 02 0 1 6 . on Ubuntu > Hardy 8.04 Server,it did not worked. Was there any error message? What links do you currently have? I.e. what does ls -l /etc/{init,rc?}.d/*resque say? -- Ben.
From: Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn on 1 Jun 2010 06:21 Ben Bacarisse wrote: > Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn writes: >> kaushal wrote: >>> Ben Bacarisse wrote: >>>> [comments in init scripts define default runlevels for >>>> `update-rc.d default'] >> >> All available Debian and Ubuntu documentation suggests that you are dead >> wrong, and that these documentation comments are nothing more than >> comments (that help admins to restore the defaults *manually* when >> necessary). > > Not "all" as far as I can see. The installed man page I have has: > > update-rc.d has two modes of operation for installing scripts into the > boot sequence. A legacy mode where command line arguments are used to > decide the sequence and runlevel configuration, and the default mode > where dependency and runlevel information in the init.d script LSB > comment header is used instead. Such header is required to be present > in init.d scripts. See the insserv(8) manual page for details about > the LSB header format. > > It seems that the comments are more than pure documentation. Interesting, thanks. Since my Debian manpage does not have this paragraph, I presume Debian and Ubuntu (which version?) differ here. Ubuntu's update- rc.d is probably newer or from a different package. What is the date of your Ubuntu manpage? My Debian's has caption (at the top) "sysv-rc" and is dated (at the bottom) "14 November 2005". That particular package (sysv-rc) was still from "stable" (Lenny); I see now that Debian testing (Squeeze) and unstable (Sid) would replace sysv-rc with file-rc, and symlinks with /etc/runlevel.conf, but still provide /usr/sbin/update-rc.d for compatibility. This might be relevant to the OP's problem in Ubuntu as well. >> Instead, from the (Debian) update-rc.d(8) manpage: >> >> | If `defaults' is used then update-rc.d will make links to start the >> | ser‐ >> | vice in runlevels 2345 and to stop the service in runlevels >> | 016. [...] > > Yes, I was wrong about the action of the "defaults" argument. Since > this is what the OP apparently used, my remarks were useless or worse. ACK Regards, PointedEars
From: Ben Bacarisse on 1 Jun 2010 20:23
Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars(a)web.de> writes: > Ben Bacarisse wrote: <snip> >> [...] The installed man page I have has: >> >> update-rc.d has two modes of operation for installing scripts into the >> boot sequence. A legacy mode where command line arguments are used to >> decide the sequence and runlevel configuration, and the default mode >> where dependency and runlevel information in the init.d script LSB >> comment header is used instead. Such header is required to be present >> in init.d scripts. See the insserv(8) manual page for details about >> the LSB header format. <snip> > Interesting, thanks. Since my Debian manpage does not have this paragraph, > I presume Debian and Ubuntu (which version?) 10.04 > differ here. Ubuntu's update- > rc.d is probably newer or from a different package. What is the date of > your Ubuntu manpage? 14 November 2005. > My Debian's has caption (at the top) "sysv-rc" and is dated (at the bottom) > "14 November 2005". Odd. My man page also captioned sysv-rc and dated the same as yours. Maybe someone forgot to change the date. From update-rc.d.8.gz: ..\" Hey, Emacs! This is an -*- nroff -*- source file. ..\" Authors: Ian Jackson, Miquel van Smoorenburg ..TH "UPDATE\-RC.D" "8" "14 November 2005" "Debian Project" "sysv-rc" ..SH "NAME" update\-rc.d \- install and remove System\-V style init script links [...etc] <snip> -- Ben. |