From: Richard Maine on
Elijah Cardon <invalid(a)invalid.net> wrote:

> You seem to be working on what I would call an analog of gcc for fortran, is
> it MinGW? EC

Actually gfortran *IS* part of gcc these days. The term "gcc" changed
meanings a few years ago. It used to be the name of the Gnu C compiler.
Now gcc stands for Gnu Compiler Collection (I think that name is right;
it is at least close), which includes the C compiler and several others,
GFortran among them.

G95 is another free compiler, It is also a Gnu product in a sense (at
least it is released under the GPL, with copyright assigned to the Gnu
Foundation), but separate from the Gnu Compiler Collection. Some people
confuse the two, which causes, well... confusion... as they are
significantly different.

--
Richard Maine | Good judgement comes from experience;
email: last name at domain . net | experience comes from bad judgement.
domain: summertriangle | -- Mark Twain
From: Tim Prince on
Richard Maine wrote:
> Elijah Cardon <invalid(a)invalid.net> wrote:
>
>> You seem to be working on what I would call an analog of gcc for fortran, is
>> it MinGW? EC
>
> Actually gfortran *IS* part of gcc these days.
>
> G95 is another free compiler,

g77, gfortran, and g95 all are available for 32-bit Windows in both
MinGW (requires a Microsoft library) and cygwin form(newlib open source,
not gnu library). None are available yet for 64-bit Windows.