Prev: ath: fix code readability in regd.c
Next: set_cpus_allowed_ptr: don't use rq->migration_thread after unlock
From: Ferenc Wagner on 30 Mar 2010 13:00
---
I lost this free somehow. Does squashfs_put_super() need protection
from multiple invocation? If not, this kfree could be removed from
there, and the condition from both places.

fs/squashfs/backend.c | 4 ++++
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/squashfs/backend.c b/fs/squashfs/backend.c
index a6136ca..0ae37ab 100644
--- a/fs/squashfs/backend.c
+++ b/fs/squashfs/backend.c
@@ -24,6 +24,10 @@ int squashfs_find_backend(struct file_system_type *fs_type, int flags,

void squashfs_kill_super(struct super_block *sb)
{
+ if (sb->s_fs_info) {
+ kfree(sb->s_fs_info);
+ sb->s_fs_info = NULL;
+ }
#ifdef CONFIG_BLOCK
if (sb->s_bdev) {
kill_block_super(sb);
--
1.6.5

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: ath: fix code readability in regd.c
Next: set_cpus_allowed_ptr: don't use rq->migration_thread after unlock