Prev: net: Make accesses to ->br_port safe for sparse RCU
Next: [PATCH 2/5] viafb: get rid of i2c debug cruft
From: Randy Dunlap on 5 May 2010 18:10
On 05/05/10 14:54, ebiederm(a)xmission.com wrote:
>
> It appears gcc can't cope with using an enum that is only declared in
> an inline function declaration, that doesn't even use the variable
> that is so declared.
>
> Avoid the silliness and replace the enum with an int, and make gcc
> happy.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm(a)aristanetworks.com>

Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap(a)oracle.com>

Thanks, Eric.

> ---
> include/linux/sysfs.h | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/sysfs.h b/include/linux/sysfs.h
> index e58ca1c..17cbeb7 100644
> --- a/include/linux/sysfs.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sysfs.h
> @@ -318,7 +318,7 @@ static inline void sysfs_put(struct sysfs_dirent *sd)
> {
> }
>
> -static inline void sysfs_exit_ns(enum kobj_ns_type type, const void *tag)
> +static inline void sysfs_exit_ns(int type, const void *tag)
> {
> }
>


--
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: net: Make accesses to ->br_port safe for sparse RCU
Next: [PATCH 2/5] viafb: get rid of i2c debug cruft