From: left_coast on
GT wrote:

> test

Welcome to the group. If you intended your test message to be posted to
"alt.os.linux.mandrake" it was indeed a success. Anyone telling you that
the test failed is a deliberate liar. Why anyone would feel the need to lie
in such a way is beyond me. I will tell you that many that state this lie
do so repeatedly, even after the lie has been pointed out. I suggest you
note who tells such lies and treat their posts accordingly.

That said, there are a number of test groups in usenet for testing purposes.
It is considered polite to post test messages to test groups. I point out
again, being impolite is NOT the same as the test post failing.

--
Because I am tired of google trolls, I have started blocking all usenet
posts from Google. Have fun Ethan, Tina, Maureen, or whatever name you
chose to go by.
From: freemont on
On Thu, 05 Oct 2006 16:37:11 -0700, left_coast wrote:

> GT wrote:
>
>> test
>
> Welcome to the group. If you intended your test message to be posted to
> "alt.os.linux.mandrake" it was indeed a success. Anyone telling you that
> the test failed is a deliberate liar. Why anyone would feel the need to
> lie in such a way is beyond me. I will tell you that many that state this
> lie do so repeatedly, even after the lie has been pointed out. I suggest
> you note who tells such lies and treat their posts accordingly.
>
> That said, there are a number of test groups in usenet for testing
> purposes. It is considered polite to post test messages to test groups. I
> point out again, being impolite is NOT the same as the test post failing.

What if they post the TEST using a SCRIPT from a FILE without PROOF?????
bwaaaahahahahahahahahahaha!!!

--
"Because all you of Earth are idiots!"
?`?.??.???`?-> freemont? <-???`?.??.???
From: Dan C on
On Fri, 06 Oct 2006 14:52:07 -0400, freemont wrote:

>> I'm not arguing if it came from a script or not because IT DOES NOT
>> MATTER. Only an idiot would think it does.

> You say it does not matter but HOW CAN YOU KNOW that the POST that was a
> TEST did not come from a SCRIPT in a FILE????? Are you amnisen...
> omnice... omniscen... some kinda knowitall???!? Once again you show that
> YOU ARE STUPID and you PROVE that you know NOTHING AT ALL! NOTHING, i
> tells ye, NOTHING! BWAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAAA!!!1!!1!

Hehehe. This is funny.

Are you sure you're not really Matt_the_Mouth, replying to himself so he
has someone to argue with, since everyone else ignores him? LOL.

Thanks for the laughs!

--
"Ubuntu" - an African word meaning "Slackware is too hard for me".


From: Dave on
On Fri, 06 Oct 2006 14:59:08 -0500, Dan C wrote:

> Hehehe. This is funny.
>
> Are you sure you're not really Matt_the_Mouth, replying to himself so he
> has someone to argue with, since everyone else ignores him? LOL.

Aka "sockpuppet". ;)

--
Linux: because I work with Windows, and that's bad enough.
AOLM FAQ - http://blinkynet.net/comp/faq_aolm.html
RLU #300033 - MDK 10.2 - WindowMaker 0.92.0
From: left_coast on
freemont wrote:

> You say it does not matter but HOW CAN YOU KNOW that the POST that was a
> TEST did not come from a SCRIPT in a FILE?????

I don't CARE.



> Are you amnisen...
> omnice... omniscen... some kinda knowitall???!?

Nope, just don't care if an anal person can't get over the FACT that it does
not matter if the person used a script, SLRN or any other method of
posting.

> Once again you show that
> YOU ARE STUPID and you PROVE that you know NOTHING AT ALL! NOTHING, i
> tells ye, NOTHING! BWAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAAA!!!1!!1!

Not stupid, don't care. The fact that you made an issue of it shows a lack
of knowledge on your part. Bet you are going to go off and play with your
JO buddy Dan C. now.

>
>

--
Because I am tired of google trolls, I have started blocking all usenet
posts from Google. Have fun Ethan, Tina, Maureen, or whatever name you
chose to go by.