From: tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra on
Commit-ID: 32975a4f114be52286f9a5bf6c230dbb8c0e1903
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/32975a4f114be52286f9a5bf6c230dbb8c0e1903
Author: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra(a)chello.nl>
AuthorDate: Sat, 6 Mar 2010 19:49:19 +0100
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo(a)elte.hu>
CommitDate: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 13:22:25 +0100

perf: Optimize perf_disable

Currently we always call hw_perf_disable(), even if its already disabled,
this seems superflous, esp. since it cannot be made NMI safe (see further
patches).

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra(a)chello.nl>
Cc: paulus(a)samba.org
Cc: eranian(a)google.com
Cc: robert.richter(a)amd.com
Cc: fweisbec(a)gmail.com
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme(a)infradead.org>
LKML-Reference: <new-submission>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo(a)elte.hu>
---
kernel/perf_event.c | 16 +++-------------
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/perf_event.c b/kernel/perf_event.c
index 73329de..d810846 100644
--- a/kernel/perf_event.c
+++ b/kernel/perf_event.c
@@ -93,25 +93,15 @@ void __weak perf_event_print_debug(void) { }

static DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, perf_disable_count);

-void __perf_disable(void)
-{
- __get_cpu_var(perf_disable_count)++;
-}
-
-bool __perf_enable(void)
-{
- return !--__get_cpu_var(perf_disable_count);
-}
-
void perf_disable(void)
{
- __perf_disable();
- hw_perf_disable();
+ if (!__get_cpu_var(perf_disable_count)++)
+ hw_perf_disable();
}

void perf_enable(void)
{
- if (__perf_enable())
+ if (!--__get_cpu_var(perf_disable_count))
hw_perf_enable();
}

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/