From: liketofindoutwhy on
I am learning more and more Prototype and Script.aculo.us and got the
Bungee book... and wonder if I should get some books on jQuery (jQuery
in Action, and Learning jQuery) and start learning about it too?

Once I saw a website comparing Prototype to Java and jQuery to Ruby...
but now that I read more and more about Prototype, it is said that
Prototype actually came from Ruby on Rails development and the creator
of Prototype created it with making Prototype work like Ruby in mind.
Is jQuery also like Ruby? Thanks so much for your help.



From: Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn on
liketofindoutwhy wrote:
> I am learning more and more Prototype and Script.aculo.us and got the
> Bungee book... and wonder if I should get some books on jQuery (jQuery
> in Action, and Learning jQuery) and start learning about it too?
> [...]

Prototype.js, and consequently everything based upon it, like
Script.aculo.us, is junk. The jQuery junk support forums are
elsewhere, too.


PointedEars
--
Anyone who slaps a 'this page is best viewed with Browser X' label on
a Web page appears to be yearning for the bad old days, before the Web,
when you had very little chance of reading a document written on another
computer, another word processor, or another network. -- Tim Berners-Lee
From: kangax on
On Apr 15, 9:04 am, liketofindoutwhy <liketofindout...(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
> I am learning more and more Prototype and Script.aculo.us and got the
> Bungee book... and wonder if I should get some books on jQuery (jQuery
> in Action, and Learning jQuery) and start learning about it too?
>
> Once I saw a website comparing Prototype to Java and jQuery to Ruby...
> but now that I read more and more about Prototype, it is said that
> Prototype actually came from Ruby on Rails development and the creator
> of Prototype created it with making Prototype work like Ruby in mind.
> Is jQuery also like Ruby? Thanks so much for your help.

Questions regarding prototype.js are better to be asked at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-spinoffs

Best,
kangax
From: beegee on
On Apr 15, 9:04 am, liketofindoutwhy <liketofindout...(a)gmail.com>
wrote:

> Once I saw a website comparing Prototype to Java and jQuery to Ruby...

In a very, very superficial way, yes but no, forget what I just said.
I can't make the connection (not having read the site). Ruby and
Javascript are dynamic languages. JQuery and Prototype would not be
possible if Javascript was a compiled language like Java. And I
personally think Ruby is a beautiful language whereas I haven't
experienced a library whose "use code" looks quite as ugly as JQuery.

As PointedEars said, they are both junk. If you insist on a library,
check out YUI which is a lot like Javascript.
From: Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn on
beegee wrote:
> [...] liketofindoutwhy [...] wrote:
>> Once I saw a website comparing Prototype to Java and jQuery to Ruby...
>
> In a very, very superficial way, yes but no, forget what I just said.
> I can't make the connection (not having read the site). Ruby and
> Javascript are dynamic languages. JQuery and Prototype would not be
> possible if Javascript was a compiled language like Java.

For that matter, at least JavaScript[tm] *is* a compiled language like Java.
Don't confuse prompt execution with no-compilation.

> [...]
> As PointedEars said, they are both junk. If you insist on a library,
> check out YUI which is a lot like Javascript.

I think you miss the point. YUI is *supposedly* only "more like
'Javascript'" (whatever that might be) than Prototype or jQuery in the sense
that its developers *supposedly* knew enough about the programming languages
to unleash their full potential without having to resort to inefficient and
error-prone detours of inventing "classes" and "initializers" where there
are already prototypes and constructors.


PointedEars
--
Use any version of Microsoft Frontpage to create your site.
(This won't prevent people from viewing your source, but no one
will want to steal it.)
-- from <http://www.vortex-webdesign.com/help/hidesource.htm>