From: RAM on
Twice I've run into Event 514 on my current Exchange 2003 system. We
are currently planning our transition to Exchange 2010, and I was
wondering if anyone knew if there was a limit to the number of
transaction logs that Exchange 2010 can generate? If there is, what is
it?

I'm working on how many databases to use to split up our users, and
figure the more users in a database, the more transaction logs.

I couldn't find anything on the subject here in the newsgroups or in
the MS Knowledgebase.

Thanks in advance.

-RAM
From: Ed Crowley [MVP] on
The transaction log filename has more digits in Exchange 2007 and 2010 so
the problem is far less likely to occur. In addition, each database has its
own set of logs, what with the notion of a storage group going away, further
reducing the number of files generated, but there is an opposing factor
since the size of the transaction log file from 5MB to 1MB. Still, it is
believed that this problem shouldn't occur in the future.
--
Ed Crowley MVP
"There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems."
..

"RAM" <rmilbrand(a)gfnet.com> wrote in message
news:4b5ab944-385f-4373-9fe2-276eefb1ce38(a)34g2000yqp.googlegroups.com...
> Twice I've run into Event 514 on my current Exchange 2003 system. We
> are currently planning our transition to Exchange 2010, and I was
> wondering if anyone knew if there was a limit to the number of
> transaction logs that Exchange 2010 can generate? If there is, what is
> it?
>
> I'm working on how many databases to use to split up our users, and
> figure the more users in a database, the more transaction logs.
>
> I couldn't find anything on the subject here in the newsgroups or in
> the MS Knowledgebase.
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> -RAM

From: RAM on
Thanks for the reply, Ed.

- RAM
 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: Unable to send E-mail
Next: OAB Sync Issues