From: Andrew Morton on
On Wed, 09 Jun 2010 12:56:50 -0400
Davidlohr Bueso <dave.bueso(a)gmail.com> wrote:

> If the last if condition passes the cdrom_mutex mutex will not be unlocked.
> This patch fixes this and also removes the unnecessary doit label that was only invoked by the done label.
>

Confused. There is no way in which cdrom_sysctl_info() can forget to
unlock cdrom_mutex.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
From: Davidlohr Bueso on
On Mon, 2010-06-14 at 12:34 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 09 Jun 2010 12:56:50 -0400
> Davidlohr Bueso <dave.bueso(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > If the last if condition passes the cdrom_mutex mutex will not be unlocked.
> > This patch fixes this and also removes the unnecessary doit label that was only invoked by the done label.
> >
>
> Confused. There is no way in which cdrom_sysctl_info() can forget to
> unlock cdrom_mutex.
>

Ok, I had misread the code then, one of the reasons I don't like goto
labels, but that's a different story.

Regarding cdrom_sysctl_info(), I have noticed in several netbooks
(haven't
looked in other machines with no cdrom drive) that the
/proc/sys/dev/cdrom/info file shows no values for the listed entries,
ie:

CD-ROM information, Id: cdrom.c 3.20 2003/12/17

drive name:
drive speed:
drive # of slots:
Can close tray:
Can open tray:
....

Now, is this expected behavior? If not, should it be changed to
something
more descriptive? Perhaps it would affect user space applications that
read
the file?

Thanks,
Davidlohr

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
From: Andrew Morton on
On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 14:40:54 -0400
Davidlohr Bueso <dave.bueso(a)gmail.com> wrote:

> Regarding cdrom_sysctl_info(), I have noticed in several netbooks
> (haven't
> looked in other machines with no cdrom drive) that the
> /proc/sys/dev/cdrom/info file shows no values for the listed entries,
> ie:
>
> CD-ROM information, Id: cdrom.c 3.20 2003/12/17
>
> drive name:
> drive speed:
> drive # of slots:
> Can close tray:
> Can open tray:
> ...
>
> Now, is this expected behavior? If not, should it be changed to
> something
> more descriptive? Perhaps it would affect user space applications that
> read
> the file?

It works for me.

Does your kernel build have CONFIG_SYSCTL=n? If so, then all that code
is disabled. That seems a bit bogus to me and perhaps we should enable
at least some of that code by CONFIG_PROCFS instead.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/