Prev: x86: Do not write to VGA memory space if CONFIG_VGA_CONSOLE is undefined
Next: [PATCH] x86: correctly wire up the newuname system call
From: Christoph Hellwig on 19 Apr 2010 23:30
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 12:21:47PM -0700, Andy Isaacson wrote:
> 2.6.34-rc4 uname(2) from a x86_32 process copies out 325 bytes rather
> than the 390 bytes that 2.6.31 copied out (and that userland expects):

Which means we're missing exactly the domainname field in new_utsname,
which differenciates it from the old utsname structure. Looks like we
end up calling the old uname sscall instead of the new one for some
reason.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: x86: Do not write to VGA memory space if CONFIG_VGA_CONSOLE is undefined
Next: [PATCH] x86: correctly wire up the newuname system call