Prev: Promise TX4302 support?
Next: Debian's Kernel 2.6.24 and future versions: Use amd64 or 686?
From: phil-news-nospam on 18 Apr 2008 02:31
I'm looking for a good choice of video capture card. But I don't one (just)
RF input. I'm really looking for component (YPbPr) input with hardware
compression, and a corresponding output. If it can also do other formats
of video, that's a plus. HD would be a big plus, too.

--
|WARNING: Due to extreme spam, I no longer see any articles originating from |
| Google Groups. If you want your postings to be seen by more readers |
| you will need to find a different place to post on Usenet. |
| Phil Howard KA9WGN (email for humans: first name in lower case at ipal.net) |
From: Chris Davies on 18 Apr 2008 04:28
phil-news-nospam(a)ipal.net wrote:
> I'm looking for a good choice of video capture card. But I don't one (just)
> RF input. I'm really looking for component (YPbPr) input with hardware
> compression, and a corresponding output. If it can also do other formats
> of video, that's a plus. HD would be a big plus, too.

Would an Osprey do what you need? (www.viewcast.com) We use the 200/220
cards for a/v streaming capture with the bttv driver. TBH, though, I
don't know how much is hardware assisted; you'll have to check the specs.

Chris
From: phil-news-nospam on 20 Apr 2008 20:59
On Fri, 18 Apr 2008 09:28:16 +0100 Chris Davies <chris-usenet(a)roaima.co.uk> wrote:

| phil-news-nospam(a)ipal.net wrote:
|> I'm looking for a good choice of video capture card. But I don't one (just)
|> RF input. I'm really looking for component (YPbPr) input with hardware
|> compression, and a corresponding output. If it can also do other formats
|> of video, that's a plus. HD would be a big plus, too.
|
| Would an Osprey do what you need? (www.viewcast.com) We use the 200/220
| cards for a/v streaming capture with the bttv driver. TBH, though, I
| don't know how much is hardware assisted; you'll have to check the specs.

It doesn't have component input. It has SDI, so a separate component to SDI
device would make it workable. It has no output, though.

Costs are probably going to be way high by the time that is added. I can't
download the spec sheets without logging in and I'm sure not going to give
them any valid info to register.

--
|WARNING: Due to extreme spam, I no longer see any articles originating from |
| Google Groups. If you want your postings to be seen by more readers |
| you will need to find a different place to post on Usenet. |
| Phil Howard KA9WGN (email for humans: first name in lower case at ipal.net) |
From: Ant on 21 Apr 2008 09:29
On 4/20/2008 5:59 PM PT, phil-news-nospam(a)ipal.net typed:

> |> I'm looking for a good choice of video capture card. But I don't one (just)
> |> RF input. I'm really looking for component (YPbPr) input with hardware
> |> compression, and a corresponding output. If it can also do other formats
> |> of video, that's a plus. HD would be a big plus, too.
> |
> | Would an Osprey do what you need? (www.viewcast.com) We use the 200/220
> | cards for a/v streaming capture with the bttv driver. TBH, though, I
> | don't know how much is hardware assisted; you'll have to check the specs.
>
> It doesn't have component input. It has SDI, so a separate component to SDI
> device would make it workable. It has no output, though.
>
> Costs are probably going to be way high by the time that is added. I can't
> download the spec sheets without logging in and I'm sure not going to give
> them any valid info to register.

Does BugMeNot have an account for it? Why not enter fake information?
Obviously, you need a valid e-mail address (use the free ones).
--
"We are anthill men upon an anthill world." --Ray Bradbury
/\___/\
/ /\ /\ \ Phil/Ant @ http://antfarm.home.dhs.org (Personal Web Site)
| |o o| | Ant's Quality Foraged Links (AQFL): http://aqfl.net
\ _ / Remove ANT from e-mail address: philpi(a)earthlink.netANT
( ) or ANTant(a)zimage.com
Ant is currently not listening to any songs on his home computer.
 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: Promise TX4302 support?
Next: Debian's Kernel 2.6.24 and future versions: Use amd64 or 686?