|
Prev: DVD backup
Next: Snapshot app
From: techno guy on 4 Oct 2005 15:18 What is the best defragger to use on a mac? Thanks Adriel
From: clvrmnky on 4 Oct 2005 15:23 On 04/10/2005 3:18 PM, techno guy wrote: > What is the best defragger to use on a mac? > Unless you have a highly specific reason to do so, UFS+ filesystems generally need no such thing, as they tend to lay files down in a reasonably optimal manner over time.
From: Dave Hinz on 4 Oct 2005 15:31 On 4 Oct 2005 12:18:14 -0700, techno guy <adrielk(a)gmail.com> wrote: > What is the best defragger to use on a mac? You don't need one. In case you're a recent convert from Windows, you should know that you also don't need an antivirus, antispyware, and especially you don't need anything with the name "Norton" attached to it. Dave Hinz
From: clvrmnky on 4 Oct 2005 15:35 On 04/10/2005 3:31 PM, Dave Hinz wrote: > On 4 Oct 2005 12:18:14 -0700, techno guy <adrielk(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >>What is the best defragger to use on a mac? > > > You don't need one. In case you're a recent convert from Windows, you > should know that you also don't need an antivirus, antispyware, and > especially you don't need anything with the name "Norton" attached to > it. > How the mighty have fallen. Wasn't Norton the company that had the awesome utils for 16-bit Windows that let you hack directly on your files as they lay on disk? Truly geek-inspired and necessary on that crufty old system.
From: Richard E Maine on 4 Oct 2005 16:05
In article <IPA0f.17811$p5.3434(a)nnrp.ca.mci.com!nnrp1.uunet.ca>, clvrmnky <clvrmnky-uunet(a)coldmail.com.invalid> wrote: > On 04/10/2005 3:31 PM, Dave Hinz wrote: > > On 4 Oct 2005 12:18:14 -0700, techno guy <adrielk(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > especially you don't need anything with the name "Norton" attached to > > it. > > > How the mighty have fallen. Wasn't Norton the company that had the > awesome utils for 16-bit Windows that let you hack directly on your > files as they lay on disk? Truly geek-inspired and necessary on that > crufty old system. Yes. But the mighty didn't "fall". He just sold his name. You are recalling the days when Norton really meant Peter Norton. Yes, he wrote good, useful, and highly respected stuff. But he long ago sold his name to Symantec. Though he got lots of money for selling his name, I don't know if he got the better end of the deal. :-( The name Norton no longer has anything at all to do with Peter Norton. -- Richard Maine | Good judgment comes from experience; email: my first.last at org.domain | experience comes from bad judgment. org: nasa, domain: gov | -- Mark Twain |