From: Hugh Jeego on

"terryc" <newssixspam-spam(a)woa.com.au> wrote in message
news:pan.2008.08.02.02.15.11.368508(a)woa.com.au...
> On Sat, 02 Aug 2008 07:42:29 +1000, Hugh Jeego wrote:
>
>> Correct in every case. However, the end point of what you said above
>> comes
>> to this - if the "tech" is definitely an honest person, they arent
>> charging
>> more than $50 an hour (not including drive time if it takes you 30
>> minutes
>> or more to get there thus making a round trip 1 hour or more). No honest
>> "tech" - and by that I mean someone who works in the industry because
>> they
>> love it, know what they are doing and just cant get enough of it - would
>> do
>> that.
>
> I'll take that as a joke. Come back and give me another opinion when
> you've been in this game 20 years.
>

Been in it a lot longer than 20 years so take it whatever way you want - if
they are charging more than $50 an hour if within a 30 minute drive then
they are ripping people off, simple as that.

Anyway, the market always irons those rip off artists out.

From: Hugh Jeego on

"Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
news:6ffr16Fbaao4U1(a)mid.individual.net...
>
>> Rod, try Avast again now and tell us what you think.
>
> OK, but I have never had a problem with AVG free updating reliably
> automatically and
> thats over a number of systems now because its what I normally put on
> foreign systems.

Did you try it? I must say that after about 6 weeks of Avast I am thoroughly
disappointed. It reliably updates but it certainly is left in the dust by
AVG when picking out viruses etc.


From: Rod Speed on
Hugh Jeego <id(a)example.com> wrote
> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa(a)gmail.com> wrote

>>> Rod, try Avast again now and tell us what you think.

>> OK, but I have never had a problem with AVG free updating reliably automatically and
>> thats over a number of systems now because its what I normally put on foreign systems.

> Did you try it?

Nar, managed to forget to.

> I must say that after about 6 weeks of Avast I am thoroughly disappointed. It reliably updates but it certainly is
> left in the dust by AVG when picking out viruses etc.

OK, just as well I forgot |-)

AVG keeps finding viruses in stuff its been happy with for a long time.

I havent bothered to check whether they are false hits or not tho. Likely not, they are mostly in keygens.